Thought-provoking and highly relevant review (https://lnkd.in/ejskCZGd) to start the new year focused on genomic abnormalities in iPSCs, in particular the 20q11.21 abnormality, found in over 20% of cell lines:
- Alteration to this region is also found in cancers - there is a lot that can be learned from cross-field analysis to help understand the impact in iPSCs (starting my career in cancer genomics, this is something I am particularly interested in 😊)
- The importance of optimising culture conditions to minimise the risk of developing alterations but also regularly testing to identify if/when changes occur
- The range of technologies for testing and their advantages and disadvantages with regards to sensitivity, specificity, turnaround time and cost. There is no one size fits all and is highly dependent on the lab, budget, speed, complexity of analysis and what the ultimate purpose of the cell line is
- What do you do if you find your cell line has an abnormality? Are they destined for the clinical waste or can you eliminate the abnormal cells and retain the healthy population?
The ending point here is exactly why we developed the RESCUE platform to take cell lines with any mosaic abnormality, mutation or unwanted genetic change and recover them:
- Improve the reproducibility, reliability, consistency of data, as highlighted by the ISSCR standards initiative (https://lnkd.in/ehcFMsCc)
- Ensure your results are relevant and not influenced or impacted by alterations to the cells
- iPSCs are not cheap to culture and take a lot of time. Putting them in the clinical waste and starting again is a miserable thought for labs!
Don’t be afraid to test your cell lines (or get Cellected to!), options are available to recover problem cell lines 😊
(https://lnkd.in/ehRAfUta)
The power of microfluidics
1yCongrats Claire. Awesome news!