Skip to main content

Screening FDI in the EU: A Cornerstone of an Economic Security Agenda

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Weaponising Investments

Part of the book series: Springer Studies in Law & Geoeconomics ((SSLG,volume 1))

Abstract

Between 2017 and 2021 the European Union has transformed Chinese FDI from an economic means into a security threat. Yet very few scholars interrogated how the nexus between Chinese FDI, and security emerged in Europe. This chapter seeks to answer the question of how have actors and stakeholders transformed Chinese FDI from a purely economic matter into a security issue. The working hypothesis argues that if views of Chinese FDI as a threat emerge, then they induce the transformation of FDI from an economic to a security issue, and the evolution of the debate and policymaking in the EU confirms the hypothesis. The chapter demonstrates that security considerations related to traditional security were not the only reasons driving the process, economic considerations too played a central role in the securitisation process. Therefore, this chapters’ contribution is foremost empirical. Empirically, firstly, it sheds light on the dynamics of the process that led Chinese FDI to becoming a security issue in Europe and clarifies the drivers of such a shift as not exclusively related to traditional security but also to economic considerations. Secondly, it reveals a trend of increasing interconnection between security and economy in Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In May 2021, the European Parliament adopted a resolution where it formally freezes the process of ratification of the CAI in reaction to the exchange of sanctions between the EU and China, which saw targeted five Members of the European Parliament as well as the subcommittee on Human Rights. European Parliament, ‘MEPs Refuse Any Agreement with China Whilst Sanctions Are in Place’, 20 May 2021, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20210517IPR04123/meps-refuse-any-agreement-with-china-whilst-sanctions-are-in-place.

  2. 2.

    Lin (2011), pp. 1–14. Lardy (2011).

  3. 3.

    Overholt (2010), pp. 21–34.

  4. 4.

    Interview EU September 2020.

  5. 5.

    Interview EU January 2019d, gi; EU September 2019; EU September 2020.

  6. 6.

    Godement and Vasselier (2017), pp. 1–127. Interview EU September 2019; EU January 2020; EU May 2020a, b; EU September 2020; EU December 2020; EU May 2021a.

  7. 7.

    Interview EU January 2019a; EU December 2020; EU May 2021b.

  8. 8.

    Interviews EU January 2019a, b, c, d, f, gi; EU December 2020; EU May 2021a, b.

  9. 9.

    Interviews EU September 2019; EU September 2020; EU May 2021b; IT September 2020b.

  10. 10.

    Interview EU January 2019a, b, c, d, e, f, gi, May 2020a, b, October 2020; Breslin (2021), pp. 148–154.

  11. 11.

    Interview EU January 2019a, b, EU September 2019, EU May 2020b, EU September 2020.

  12. 12.

    Trilateral negotiations occur between the European Commission, the Council of the EU and the European Parliament.

  13. 13.

    It must be noted how of the three senders, Germany was the one who advocated a rigid adherence to the concept of security. To this day, the German regulation in matter of FDI screening rigidly limits the power to block investments to the security realm, which includes dual-use technology. France and Italy, on the contrary, were both more flexible in including matters related to competition. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. “Foreign Trade and Investment Law”, 2021. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Artikel/Foreign-Trade/investment-screening.html.

  14. 14.

    The general EU legal principle of sincere cooperation intervenes to require member states to act in good faith when considering the opinions. It can be viewed as a ‘soft’ obligation to not reject the Commission and/or other member states’ opinions for no valid reason.

References

  • Breslin S (2021) China risen? Studying Chinese Global Power, 1st edn. Bristol University Press, Bristol

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie, Ministère de l’Economie et des Finances, and Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico (2017) Letter to Commissioner Malmström from France, Germany and Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Bungenberg M (2011) The division of competences between the EU and its Member States in the area of investment politics. In: Bungenberg M, Griebel J, Hindelang S (eds) International investment law and EU law. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 29–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2017a) COM(2017) 494 Final Welcoming Foreign Direct Investment While Protecting Essential Interests

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2017b) FDI Proposal by the European Commission. 0224. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0487/COM_COM(2017)0487_EN.pdf

  • European Commission (2017c) White Paper on the Future of Europe

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2019a) European Commission and HR/VP Contribution to the European Council. EU-China, A Strategic Outlook

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2019b) Screening of Foreign Direct Investments

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020a) White paper on levelling the playing field as regards to foreign subsidies

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020b) EU foreign investments screening mechanism becomes fully operational

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2017) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for screening of foreign direct investments into the European Union

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2021) Post Covid-19 Value Chains: Options for Reshoring Production Back to Europe in a Globalised Economy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament, and Council of the European Union (2019) (FDI Screening) Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 Establishing a Framework for the Screening of Foreign Direct Investments into the Union. OJ L 79I (21.3.2019), 1–14. 2019, no. March: 1–14. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/452/oj

  • Godement F, Vasselier A (2017) China at the gates: a new power audit of EU-China relations. European Council on Foreign Affairs

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield A, Ian M, Richard W (2017) Foreign policies of EU Member States continuity and Europeanisation, 1st edn. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kania EB, Laskai L (2021) Myths and realities of China’s military-civil fusion strategy. Center for New American Security. https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/myths-and-realities-of-chinas-military-civil-fusion-strategy

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoerich J, Miedtank T (2018) The idiosyncratic nature of Chinese foreign direct investment in Europe. Cesifo FORUM 19(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratz A, Zenglein M, Sebastian G (2021) Chinese FDI in Europe: 2020 Update

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardy N (2011) Sustaining China’s economic growth after the global financial crisis. Peterson Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin JY (2011) China and the global economy. China Econ J 4(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2011.609612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer H (2022) Awakening to China’s rise European foreign and security policy toward the People’s Republic of China. Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meunier S (2014) Divide and conquer? China and the Cacophony of foreign investment rules in the EU. J Eur Public Policy 21(7):996–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.912145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meunier S (2019) Beware of Chinese bearing gifts: why China’s direct investment poses political challenges in Europe and the United States. In: Chaisse J (ed) China’s three-prong investment strategy: bilateral, regional, and global tracks, Chapter 18. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholt WH (2010) China in the global financial crisis: rising influence, rising challenges. Wash Q 33(1):21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01636600903418652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe W, Gippner O (2017) Perceptions of China’s outward foreign direct investment in European critical infrastructure and strategic industries. Int Polit 54(4):468–486. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0044-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu C (2019) Chinese outbound investments. In: Chinese FDI in the EU and the US. Springer, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Miao L (2016) Going Global Strategy’ and global talent BT - China goes global: how China’s overseas investment is transforming its business enterprises. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57813-6_6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Warchol J (2020) The birth of the EU screening regulation, Hinderlang & Moberg, YSEC Yearbook of socio - Economic Constitutions 2020, A Common European Law on Investment Screening (CELIS)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenniges T, Lohman W (2019) Chinese FDI in the EU and the US. Simple rules for turbulent times. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6071-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2021) GDP (Current US$) - European Union, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=EU

  • Zenglein M (2020) Mapping and recalibrating Europe’s economic interdependence with China. Mercator Institute for China Studies

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Ghiretti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ghiretti, F. (2023). Screening FDI in the EU: A Cornerstone of an Economic Security Agenda. In: Hillebrand Pohl, J., Warchol , J., Papadopoulos, T., Wiesenthal, J. (eds) Weaponising Investments. Springer Studies in Law & Geoeconomics, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/17280_2023_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/17280_2023_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41474-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41475-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics