Abstract
Navigating the turbulent waters of data and algorithms, in order to participate in today’s datafied society, requires a series of transversal skills. Educators, students and citizens need both technical abilities and a set of literacies, interwoven with a critical approach, to understand the sociopolitical and cultural mechanisms governing, shaping and transforming our lives. Our chapter will reflect on the impact of datafication in society and address some questions about embracing the concept of ethics as a method for working with data towards addressing bias, ensuring that the demands of data justice are adopted in teaching and research. Our open and critical pedagogic approach calls for educators to explore data issues from a social justice perspective and through research-based learning activities. To exemplify our model, we showcase an academic development programme piloted in Uruguay which was part of a bigger research project, Understanding Data: Praxis and Politics. As part of the project, we have developed a critical pedagogic approach to support academics in teaching critical data literacies. This approach bridges research and real-world problems, using open data as open educational resources (OER) to support learners and educators to co-create knowledge in an interdisciplinary manner through research-based learning activities. Our curriculum provides academics with a data ethics framework and solid theoretical background, alongside analytical tools, and activities to develop lifelong learning. This approach enables participants to understand and challenge datafication and support informed and transformative democratic practices and dialogue, empowering citizens to address social justice concerns.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Understanding Data: Praxis and Politics. https://datapraxis.net/
- 2.
NESTA – Problem Definition. https://www.nesta.org.uk/toolkit/problem-definition/
- 3.
Open Data Institute – Data Ethics Canvas. https://theodi.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/ODI-Data-Ethics-Canvas-2019-05.pdf
- 4.
Data Detox Kit. https://tacticaltech.org/projects/data-detox-kit
- 5.
Data Justice Lab – Critical data literacy tools for advancing data justice: A guidebook. https://datajusticelab.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/djl-data-literacy-guidebook.pdf
References
Atenas, J., & Ciociola, C. (2016). Datos Abiertos como Recursos Educativos Abiertos: Modelo de formación docente para América Latina. Documento de trabajo. ILDA, Montevideo.
Atenas, J., & Havemann, L. (2019). Open data sectors and communities: Education. In T. Davies, S. Walker, M. Rubinstein, & F. Perini (Eds.), The state of open data: Histories and horizons. African Minds and International Development Research Centre. https://www.stateofopendata.od4d.net/chapters/sectors/education.html
Atenas, J., Havemann, L., & Priego, E. (2015). Open data as open educational resources: Towards transversal skills and global citizenship. Open Praxis, 7(4), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.233
Atenas, J., Belbis, J., Pane, J., Bonina, C., & Casanueva, J. M. (2019). Estado abierto a través de Datos abiertos. In Estado abierto a través de Datos abiertos (p. 133). Iniciativa Latinoamericana por los Datos Abiertos y Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243389
Atenas, J., Havemann, L., & Timmermann, C. (2020). Critical literacies for a datafied society: Academic development and curriculum design in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 28. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2468
Barassi, V. (2019). Coerced digital participation, child data citizen. Retrieved from http://childdatacitizen.com/coerced-digital-participation/
Benjamin, R. (2019). Assessing risk, automating racism. Science, 366(6464), 421–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz3873
Bohman, J. (2005). Critical theory. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2021 edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/critical-theory/
Bonatti, P. A., Bos, B., Decker, S., Fernández, J. D., Kirrane, S., Peristeras, V., et al. (2018). Data privacy vocabularies and controls: Semantic web for transparency and privacy. In SW4SG@ ISWC. https://openreview.net/pdf?id=98A2Vi9dZO
Bronner, S. E. (2009). Critical theory. In The international encyclopedia of revolution and protest. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198073.wbierp0418
Charitonos, K., Albuerne Rodriguez, C., Witthaus, G., & Bossu, C. (2020). Advancing social justice for asylum seekers and refugees in the UK: An open education approach to strengthening capacity through refugee action’s frontline immigration advice project. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1). Retrieved from https://www-jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/jime.563/print/
Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
Cronin, C. (2020). Open education: Walking a critical path. In Open (ing) education (pp. 9–25). Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004422988_002
D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data feminism. MIT Press.
Deakin Crick, R., & Joldersma, C. W. (2007). Habermas, lifelong learning and citizenship education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26(2), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-006-9015-1
Decuypere, M. (2021). The topologies of data practices: A methodological introduction. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.650
Dencik, L., & Sanchez-Monedero, J. (2022). Data justice. Internet Policy Review, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2022.1.1615
Dencik, L., Hintz, A., & Cable, J. (2016). Towards data justice? The ambiguity of anti-surveillance resistance in political activism. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679678
Dencik, L., Hintz, A., Redden, J., & Treré, E. (2019). Exploring data justice: Conceptions, applications and directions. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 873–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606268
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
Evans, T., & Nation, D. (1993). Reforming open and distance education: Critical reflections from practice. Routledge.
Fischer, G., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2009). Community-based learning: The core competency of residential, research-based universities. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Learning in communities: Interdisciplinary perspectives on human centered information technology (pp. 75–110). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-332-3_12
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). Pantheon.
Fraser, N. (2008). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalising world. Polity Press.
Freire, P. (1972a). The pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin.
Freire, P. (1972b). Cultural action for freedom. Penguin.
Gebru, T. (2019). Oxford handbook on AI ethics book chapter on race and gender. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.06165.pdf
Giroux, H. (2010). Rethinking education as the practice of freedom: Paulo Freire and the promise of critical pedagogy. Policy Futures in Education, 8(6), 715–721. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2010.8.6.715
Gurstein, M. B. (2011). Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? First Monday, 16(2). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3316
Havemann, L. (2016). Open educational resources. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory: Living edition. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_218-1
Havemann, L., & Atenas, J. (2018). Enacting critical civic education through the Open Government Partnership commitments. OER18: Open to All. Retrieved from https://oer18.oerconf.org/sessions/enacting-critical-civic-education-through-the-open-government-partnership-commitments-1911/
Heeks, R. (2017). A structural model and manifesto for data justice for international development (Development Informatics Working Paper, 69). Retrieved from https://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/gdi/publications/workingpapers/di/di_wp69.pdf
Hooks, B. (2014). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
Jarke, J., & Breiter, A. (2019). The datafication of education. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1573833
Johnson, J. A. (2014). From open data to information justice. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(4), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9351-8
Kellner, D. (2011). Cultural studies, multiculturalism, and media culture. In G. Dines & J. M. Humez (Eds.), Gender, race, and class in media: A critical reader (pp. 7–18). Sage.
Kitchin, R. (2021). Data lives. How data are made and shape our world. Bristol University Press.
Kleinberg, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S., & Sunstein, C. R. (2018). Discrimination in the age of algorithms. Journal of Legal Analysis, 10, 113–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laz001
Kshetri, N. (2014). Big data′ s impact on privacy, security and consumer welfare. Telecommunications Policy, 38(11), 1134–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.10.002
Kuhn, C. (2019). Whose interest is educational technology serving? Who is included and who is excluded? RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.22293
Kuhn, C. (2021). Data justice. In C. Kuhn, J. Atenas, & L. Havemann (Eds.), Understanding data: Praxis and politics. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5137475
Lehtiniemi, T., & Ruckenstein, M. (2018). The social imaginaries of data activism. Big Data & Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718821146
Lupton, D., & Southerton, C. (2021). Beyond wicked Facebook: A vital materialism perspective. In J. McKenzie & R. Patulny (Eds.), Emotional landscapes, dystopia and future imaginaries. Bristol University Press. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345643662
Lupton, D., & Williamson, B. (2017). The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights. New Media & Society, 19(5), 780–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686328
Manca, A., Atenas, J., Ciociola, C., & Nascimbeni, F. (2017). Critical pedagogy and open data for educating towards social cohesion. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/917
Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2016). What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: Laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.011
Marco, C. A., & Larkin, G. L. (2000). Research ethics: Ethical issues of data reporting and the quest for authenticity. Academic Emergency Medicine, 7(6), 691–694. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02049.x
Markham, A. N. (2006). Method as ethic, ethic as method. Journal of Information Ethics, 15(2), 37–55.
Markham, A. N., Tiidenberg, K., & Herman, A. (2018). Ethics as methods: Doing ethics in the era of big data research – Introduction. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118784502
Milan, S., & van der Velden, L. (2016). The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture and Society, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0205
Milan, S., & van der Velden, L. (2018). Reversing data politics: An introduction to the special issue. Krisis: Journal for contemporary philosophy, 2018(1). https://archive.krisis.eu/reversing-data-politics-an-introduction-to-the-special-issue/
Mohamed, S., Png, M. T., & Isaac, W. (2020). Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 33(4), 659–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8
Naef, E., Muelbert, P., Raza, S., Frederick, R., Kendall, J., & Gupta, N. (2014). Using mobile data for development. Cartesian and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved from https://docs.gatesfoundation.org/Documents/Using%20Mobile%20Data%20for%20Development.pdf
Nielsen, R. P. (2016). Action research as an ethics praxis method. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2482-3
ODC. (2015). International Open Data Charter. https://opendatacharter.net/principles/
Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2019). ‘Personal data literacies’: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media & Society, 21(2), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799523
Podetti, M., Rodés, V., Kuhn, C., Atenas, J., & Veiga, C. (2021). Promoviendo una perspectiva crítica sobre los datos entre docentes universitarios. Presented at the LACLO LALA JINIS, Perú. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5893456
Raffaghelli, J. E., & Stewart, B. (2020). Centering complexity in ‘educators’ data literacy’ to support future practices in faculty development: A systematic review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1696301
Raffaghelli, J. E., Manca, S., Stewart, B., Prinsloo, P., & Sangrà, A. (2020). Supporting the development of critical data literacies in higher education: Building blocks for fair data cultures in society. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00235-w
Reggi, L., & Dawes, S. (2016). Open government data ecosystems: Linking transparency for innovation with transparency for participation and accountability. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9820, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_6
Reijers, W., Wright, D., Brey, P., et al. (2018). Methods for practising ethics in research and innovation: A literature review, critical analysis and recommendations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 1437–1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9961-8
Roberts-Holmes, G. (2015). The “datafication” of early years pedagogy: “If the teaching is good, the data should be good and if there’s bad teaching, there is bad data”. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.924561
Sarin, R. K. (2021). Just society. Theory and Decision. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-021-09806-3
Selwyn, N. (2015). Data entry: Towards the critical study of digital data and education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.921628
Simon, J. (2015). Distributed epistemic responsibility in a hyperconnected era. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The Onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era (pp. 145–159). Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6_17
Soder, R., Goodlad, J. I., & McMannon, T. J. (2002). Developing democratic character in the young. Jossey-Bass.
Spence, C. (2019). ‘Judgement’ versus ‘metrics’ in higher education management. Higher Education, 77(5), 761–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0300-z
Spratt, S., & Baker, J. (2015). Big data and international development: Impacts, scenarios and policy options (IDS Evidence Report, p. 163). IDS. Retrieved from https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/7198
Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717736335
Taylor, L., & Broeders, D. (2015). In the name of development: Power, profit and the datafication of the global south. Geoforum, 64, 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.002
Timmermann, C. (2018). Contributive justice: An exploration of a wider provision of meaningful work. Social Justice Research, 31(1), 85–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-017-0293-2
UNESCO. (2015). Transversal competencies in education policy and practice (S. Strandberg, Ed.). UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002319/231907E.pdf
UNESCO. (2019). Open educational resources. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer
Van Es, K., & Schäfer, M. T. (2017). The datafied society. Studying culture through data. Amsterdam University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=624771
Weller, M., de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, B., & McAndrew, P. (2015). The impact of OER on teaching and learning practice. Open Praxis, 7(4), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.227
Yang, S. (2021). Feminismo, ética y datos geoespaciales. Una breve reflexión hacia su análisis conjunto (J. Atenas y S. Fumega, Eds.). Documento de trabajo, ILDA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4681033
Young, I. M. (2011). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
Zembylas, M. (2013). Critical pedagogy and emotion: Working through ‘troubled knowledge’ in post- traumatic contexts. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2012.743468
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
Zuboff, S. (2019). Surveillance capitalism. Profile Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Atenas, J., Havemann, L., Kuhn, C., Timmermann, C. (2023). Critical Data Literacy in Higher Education: Teaching and Research for Data Ethics and Justice. In: Raffaghelli, J.E., Sangrà, A. (eds) Data Cultures in Higher Education . Higher Education Dynamics, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24193-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24193-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24192-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24193-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)