Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence Robot Safety: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda Based on New Institutional Economics and Social Media

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

According to “Huang's law”, Artificial intelligence (AI)-related hardware increases in power 4–10 times per year. AI can benefit various stages of real estate development, from planning and construction to occupation and demolition. However, Hong Kong's legal system is currently behind when it comes to technological abilities, while the field of AI safety in built environments is still in its infancy. Negligent design and production processes, irresponsible data management, questionable deployment, algorithm training, sensor design and/or manufacture, unforeseen consequences from multiple data inputs, and erroneous AI operation based on sensor or remote data can all lead to accidents. Yet, determining how legal rules should apply to liability for losses caused by AI systems takes time. Traditional product liability laws can apply for some systems, meaning that the manufacturer will bear responsibility for a malfunctioning part. That said, more complex cases will undoubtedly have to come before the courts to determine whether something unsafe should be the manufacturer's fault or the individual's fault, as well as who should receive the subsequent financial and/or non-financial compensation, etc. Since AI adoption has an inevitable relationship with safety concerns, this project intends to shed light on responsible AI development and usage, with a specific focus on AI safety laws, policies, and people's perceptions. We will conduct a systematic literature review via the PRISMA approach to study the academic perspectives of AI safety policies and laws and data-mining publicly available content on social media platforms such as Twitter, YouTube, and Reddit to study societal concerns about AI safety in built environments. We will then research court cases and laws related to AI safety in 61 jurisdictions, in addition to policies that have been implemented globally. Two case studies on AI suppliers that sell AI hardware and software to users of built environment will also be included. Another two case studies will be conducted on built environment companies (a contractor and Hong Kong International Airport) that use AI safety tools. The results obtained from social media, court cases, legislation, and policies will be discussed with local and international experts via a workshop, then released to the public to provide the international community and Hong Kong with unique policy and legal orientations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, R. (2018). The reasonable computer: Disrupting the paradigm of tort liability. George Washington Law Review, 86, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, J. B., & Fredriksson, P. G. (2018). Culture, legal heritage and the regulation of labor. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46, 616–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., Bonnefon, F., Rahwan, I. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563, 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayhan, B. U., & Tokdemir, O. B. (2019). Safety assessment in megaprojects using artificial intelligence. Safety Science, 118, 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baghdadi A., Heristchian, M. & Kloft, H. (2020). Design of prefabricated wall-floor building systems using meta-heuristic optimization algorithms. Automation in Construction, 114, 103156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belkahla, D. O., Mellouli, S., & Trabelsi, Z. (2019). From citizens to government policy-makers: Social media data analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 36, 560–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., & Rezgui, Y. (2020). Towards a semantic construction digital twin: Directions for future research. Automation in Construction, 114, 103179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnefon, J. F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352(6293), 1573–1576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. (2019). Regulatory alternatives for AI. Computer Law & Security Review, 35, 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuéllar, M.-F. (2019). A common law for the age of artificial intelligence incremental adjudication, institutions, and relational non-arbitrariness. Columbia Law Review, 119, 1773–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curiskis, S. A., Drake, B., Osborn, T. R., & Kennedy, P. J. (2020). An evaluation of document clustering and topic modelling in two online social networks: Twitter and Reddit. Information Processing & Management, 57, 102034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devendorf, A., Bender, A., & Rottenberg, J. (2020). Depression presentations, stigma, and mental health literacy: A critical review and YouTube content analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 78, 101843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodig, C. G., & Çürüklü, B. (2012). Robots: Ethical by design. Ethics and Information Technology, 14, 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., et al. (2019). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 101994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskander, S. M. S. U., & Fankhauser, S. (2020). Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from national climate legislation. Nature Climate Change, 10, 750–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feijóo, C., & Kwon, Y. (2020). AI impacts on economy and society: Latest developments, open issues and new policy measures. Telecommunications Policy, 44, 101987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosch-Villaronga, E., & Millard, C. (2019). Cloud robotics law and regulation: Challenges in the governance of complex and dynamic cyber–physical ecosystems. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 119, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal-Tzur, A., Grant-Muller, S. M., Kuflik, T., Minkov, E., Nocera, S., & Shoor, I. (2014). The potential of social media in delivering transport policy goals. Transport Policy, 32, 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaleini, E. N., Koopialipoor, M., Momenzadeh, M., Sarafraz, M. E., Mohamad, E. T., & Gordan, B. (2019). A combination of artificial bee colony and neural network for approximating the safety factor of retaining walls. Engineering with Computers, 35, 647–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuffrida, I. (2019). Liability for AI decision-making: Some legal and ethical considerations. Fordham Law Review, 88, 439–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J., Umar, M., Soran, S., & Yue, X.-G. (2020). Exacerbating effect of energy prices on resource curse: Can research and development be a mitigating factor? Resources Policy, 67, 101689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamjoom, A. A. B., Jamjoom, A. M. A., & Marcus, H. J. (2020). Exploring public opinion about liability and responsibility in surgical robotics. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2, 194–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junker, K. W. (2014). A focus on comparison in comparative law. Duquesne Law Review, 52, 69–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, D. R., Chodos, O., Nordland, O., Rutigliano, M., & Winiwarter, W. (2020). Gaps and opportunities in nitrogen pollution policies around the world. Nature Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelanet, A. F., Johnson, B. R., & Ganatra, B. (2020). Global Abortion Policies Database: A descriptive analysis of the regulatory and policy environment related to abortion. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 62, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, R. Y. M., & Pak, D. H. A. (2010). Resistance and motivation to share sustainable development knowledge by web 2.0. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 9, 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, R. Y. M., & Poon, S. W. (2011). Using Web 2.0 to share knowledge of construction safety: The fable of economic animals. Economic Affairs, 31, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, R. Y. M., & Poon, S. W. (2013). Construction Safety. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, R. Y. M., & Chau, K. W. (2016). Econometric analyses of international housing markets. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, R. Y. M., Chau, K. W. & Zeng, F. F. (2019). Ranking of risks for the existing and new building works. Sustainability, 11, 2863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, P., Abney, K., & Bekey, G. (2011). Robot ethics: Mapping the issues for a mechanized world. Artificial Intelligence, 175, 942–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Pan, S., Li, Y., & Chen, Y. (2020). Analyzing the robotic behavior in a smart city with deep enforcement and imitation learning using IoRT. Computer Communications, 150, 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Behar, D., Tran, M., Froese, T., Mayaud, J. R., Herrera, O. E., & Merida, W. (2019). Charging infrastructure for electric vehicles in Multi-Unit Residential Buildings: Mapping feedbacks and policy recommendations. Energy Policy, 126, 444–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalek, I. M., Benn, E. K. T., dos Santos, F. L. C., Gordon, S., Wen, C., & Liu, B. (2019). A systematic review of global legal regulations on the permissible level of heavy metals in cosmetics with particular emphasis on skin lightening products. Environmental Research, 170, 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., & The, P. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6, e1000097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monkman, G. G., Kaiser, M. J., & Hyder, K. (2018).. Text and data mining of social media to map wildlife recreation activity. Biological Conservation, 228, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, A., Conway, M., & Chen, A. T. (2018). Examining thematic similarity, difference, and membership in three online mental health communities from reddit: A text mining and visualization approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 98–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perc, M., Ozer, M., & Hojnik, J. (2019). Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence. Palgrave Communications, 5, 61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regona, M., Yigitcanlar, T., Xia, B., Li, R. Y. M. (2022). Opportunities and adoption challenges of AI in the construction industry: a PRISMA review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, B. J. O., Barnes, D. K. A., & Morley, S. A. (2020). Disturbance, dispersal and marine assemblage structure: A case study from the nearshore Southern Ocean. Marine Environmental Research, 160, 105025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, R., Girolami, M., & Brilakis, I. (2020). Building information modelling, artificial intelligence and construction tech. Developments in the Built Environment, 100011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, C. D., Soares, A. L., & Pereira, C. S. (2016). Collaborative conceptualisation processes in the development of lightweight ontologies. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 46, 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, S., Li, T., Ma, H., Li, R. Y. M., Gouliamos, K., Zheng, J., Han, Y., Manta, O., Comite, U., Barros, T., Duarte, N., & Yue, X.-G. (2020). Does Employee Quality Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 12, 2692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, K. M., Orenstein, W. A., & Hinman, A. R. (2020). Performance of the United States vaccine injury compensation program (VICP): 1988–2019. Vaccine, 38, 2136–2143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, W.-J., Yue, X.-G., Liu, W., & Crabbe, M. J. C. (2020). Valuation impacts of environmental protection taxes and regulatory costs in heavy-polluting industries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 2070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2020). GDP Ranking, PPP Based. Retrieved from https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/gdp-ranking-ppp-based.

  • Yao, Q., Li, R. Y. M., Song, L., & Crabbe, M. J. C. (2021). Construction safety knowledge sharing on Twitter: A social network analysis. Safety Science, 143, 105411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yigitcanlar, T., Corchado, J. M., Mehmood, R., Li, R. Y. M., Mossberger, K., & Desouza, K. (2021). Responsible Urban innovation with local government artificial intelligence (AI): A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7, 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, L., & Li, Y. M. R. (2021). Tourist satisfaction, willingness to revisit and recommend, and mountain kangyang tourism spots sustainability: A structural equation modelling approach. Sustainability, 13, 10620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Zuo, J., Wu, G., & Huang, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of green building research 2000–2016. Architectural Science Review, 62, 74–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zotzmann, Y., van der Linden, D., & Wyrwa, K. (2019). The relation between country differences, cultural values, personality dimensions, and error orientation: An approach across three continents – Asia, Europe, and North America. Safety Science, 120, 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. UGC/IIDS15/E01/19).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita Yi Man Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Li, R.Y.M., Crabbe, M.J.C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Robot Safety: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda Based on New Institutional Economics and Social Media. In: Li, R.Y.M., Chau, K.W., Ho, D.C.W. (eds) Current State of Art in Artificial Intelligence and Ubiquitous Cities. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0737-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0737-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0736-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0737-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics