The nexus of gendered practices, energy, and space use: A comparative study of middleclass housing in Pakistan and Jordan

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102340Get rights and content

Abstract

The nexus of gendered domestic practices, energy and space use remains under-researched in energy studies, particularly in the Global South. This paper takes a gendered practice-theoretical approach to investigate women’s differential energy and space use in domestic practices. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with middleclass homeowners in Lahore, Pakistan and Amman, Jordan show that energy and space use are implicated in the gendering of domestic practices in three ways: 1) contingency of women’s energy consumption on spatial affordances of housing developments in the gendered division of private/public spheres, 2) women as primary performers of domestic energy flexibility and demand management practices and 3) women’s varied and differential agency in their roles as wives, mothers, caregivers, mothers- and daughters-in-law, income-generators, and housemaids. In Lahore, women as household managers negotiate domestic practices under an intermittent electricity supply and power dynamics of extended families and domestic service. In Amman, nuclear family structures and declining servant culture result in women’s greater reliance on energy-intensive technologies, especially for working women. In both contexts, modernist spatial regulations that determine building density and setbacks, height restrictions, spatial layouts and window placement etc. exhibit gender oversights and conflict with socio-cultural norms of privacy and segregation. This has implications for domestic energy demand, with different women having to negotiate between comfort, convenience, and consumption. The study highlights limitations of current gender-neutral and gender-binary approaches in housing and energy and calls for greater socio-cultural understanding of gender relations and intersectional agencies in domestic energy practices for improved equity and sustainability.

Introduction

Despite persisting progress towards sustainable development, gender inequality remains a pervasive form of discrimination in all forms of development [1]. The UN’s Sustainable Development Goals underscore that gender equality and women’s empowerment (SDG 5) are inextricably linked to all sustainable energy transition targets that cannot be met without considering women’s energy needs. Yet, significant gender inequalities persist: women are responsible for about three times as much unpaid care and domestic work as men [1]. At the same time, they are disproportionately impacted by ‘gender-neutral’ planning and policy [2], [3], limiting their access to energy resources. This inequitable distribution becomes critical for developing countries in the South where just under 60% of economic growth (GDP in PPP), over 80% of population expansion and two-thirds of energy demand growth is predicted to occur by 2040 [4]. This necessitates a gendered lens to energy policy and demand management in energy-consuming practices and technologies for sustainable development.

While much research on gender dynamics in the South has focused on women’s access to energy and technologies in rural areas [1], [5] or low-income settlements [6], [7], limited attention is paid to gendered roles and energy-related practices in urban and middle-income households- both on the rise in developing countries2. Moreover in the urban sphere, whilst much focus has been given to women’s economic empowerment and labour force participation [10], [11], [12], less attention is paid to how gendered roles and responsibilities manifest at the intersections of domestic practices, energy and space use. Further, most energy policy is based on techno-economic models of efficiency in which the onus of energy transitions lies with individual ‘consumers’ to make ‘rational choices’ [13], [14]. Such individualised conceptions of energy obscure the socio-culturally embedded nature of energy in everyday routines and practices [15] and overlook its distributional impacts on gender. Hence, this paper uses a gendered practice-theoretical approach to conduct a comparative analysis of domestic energy and space use in middleclass3 housing in Lahore, Pakistan and Amman, Jordan. Through a comparative study, the paper seeks to understand how gender manifests in the access to and use of technologies and spaces of domestic energy practices, such as those of comfort, cleanliness and convenience and how these are evolving under contemporary housing and energy transitions. The remaining paper is structured as follows: Section 2 presents a literature review in light of the theoretical frame used. The methodology and selected case-studies are discussed in Section 3. Section 4 presents the study findings and conclusions are given in Section 5.

Section snippets

Gender, domestic spaces, and energy-consuming practices

The house still represents one of the most gendered spaces and acts as a site for the co-constitution and reproduction of gendered practices and gendered materials, both in the Global North and South [17], [18], [19]. Low and Lawrence-Zúñiga [20] define gendered spaces as ‘particular locales that cultures invest with gender meanings, sites in which sex-differentiated practices occur, or settings that are used strategically to inform identity and produce and reproduce asymmetrical gender

Research context

Pakistan and Jordan present an interesting case for comparison due to certain similarities in climate and culture: both represent developing/emerging lower-middle income economies; both are Muslim majority countries with entrenched Islamic/religious values that shape cultural norms, influenced by their respective colonial and post-colonial histories. Both countries belong to, what Kabeer [42] refers to as, ‘the belt of extreme patriarchy’[41, p.71], with historical similarities in family,

Methodology

The study presents a qualitative comparative analysis of gendered energy practices and space use in middleclass households in Lahore,7 Pakistan and Amman, Jordan8

Findings

Main findings of the analysis are presented in three sections, focusing on the gendered nature of space use, gendered technologies and women’s agency in domestic practices:

Discussion

Comparing women’s experiences in the contexts of Lahore and Amman reveals an overall gendering of domestic spaces, technologies and demand management practices, but also shows intersectional differences in how practices are performed. Intermittent electricity supply in Lahore puts time pressures on women as mothers and household managers to coordinate electricity-dependant practices around load-shedding schedules. In this, the understanding of energy as a visible, fragile resource represents a

Conclusion

This study contributes to the limited literature on the nexus of domestic practices, energy, and space use from a gender-based practice perspective, particularly from the Global South. It addresses the gap in current practice-theoretical literature in engaging with gender relations and power dynamics to investigate women’s differential agency in energy and space use in relation to domestic practices. Based on a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with middleclass households in

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work is part of two PhD researches at the University of Cambridge, funded by the Vicky Noon Educational Foundation and the Islamic Development Bank respectively, under the Cambridge, Commonwealth & International Trust.

References (79)

  • B.K. Sovacool

    What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda

    Energy Res. Soc. Sci.

    (2014)
  • R. Galvin

    How many interviews are enough? Do qualitative interviews in building energy consumption research produce reliable knowledge?

    J. Build. Eng.

    (2015)
  • Kirsten Gram-Hanssen

    Consuming technologies – developing routines

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2008)
  • E. Fingleton-Smith

    The lights are on but no (men) are home. The effect of traditional gender roles on perceptions of energy in Kenya

    Energy Res, Soc. Sci.

    (2018)
  • M. Sunikka-Blank

    Why are women always cold? Gendered realities of energy injustice

    Inequal. Energy, Elsevier

    (2020)
  • Shannon Elizabeth Bell et al.

    Toward feminist energy systems: Why adding women and solar panels is not enough

    Energy Res. Soc. Sci.

    (2020)
  • UNDP, Gender Equality Strategy 2018-2021, United Nations Development Programme, New York, 2018....
  • J. Clancy et al.

    Appropriate gender-analysis tools for unpacking the gender-energy-poverty nexus

    Gend. Dev.

    (2007)
  • M. Govindan, D. Palit, R. Murali, D. Sankar, Gender in Electricity Policymaking in India, Nepal and Kenya, in: G....
  • IEA, International Energy Outlook 2020 (IEO2020), U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, D.C., 2020....
  • E. Cecelski

    Energy, Development and Gender: Global Correlations and Causality

    (2005)
  • UNDP, The rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World, United Nations Development Programme, New York, 2013....
  • J.A. Ghani, The emerging middle class in Pakistan: how it consumes, earns, and saves, in: Int. Conf. Mark., Institute...
  • Y. Zaidi et al.

    Women’s economic participation and empowerment in Pakistan

    (2016)
  • M.S. Moeen et al.

    Factors Influencing Choice of Energy Sources in Rural Pakistan

    Pak. Dev. Rev.

    (2016)
  • E. Shove

    Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change

    Environ. Plan. A.

    (2010)
  • E. Shove et al.

    The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes

    (2012)
  • H. Kharas

    The unprecedented expansion of the global middle class: An update, the Global Economy and Development program

    (2017)
  • S.M. Low et al.

    The anthropology of space and place: locating culture

    (2003)
  • S. Cho et al.

    Toward a field of intersectionality studies: theory, applications, and praxis

    Signs J. Women Cult. Soc.

    (2013)
  • K. Gram-Hanssen

    New needs for better understanding of household’s energy consumption – behaviour, lifestyle or practices?

    Archit. Eng. Des. Manag.

    (2014)
  • T.R. Schatzki

    Materiality and social life

    Nat. Cult.

    (2010)
  • E. Shove, Matters of practice, in: Nexus Pract. Connect. Constell. Pract., Taylor & Francis, Abingdon; New York, 2016:...
  • S. Petrova et al.

    Gender and energy: domestic inequities reconsidered

    Soc. Cult. Geogr.

    (2021)
  • M. Watson, Placing power in practice theory, in: A. Hui, T. Schatzki, E. Shove (Eds.), Nexus Pract. Connect. Constell....
  • B. Welter

    The Cult of True Womanhood: 1820–1860

    Am. Q.

    (1966)
  • B. Friedan

    The Feminine Mystique

    (1963)
  • H. Papanek

    Purdah: separate worlds and symbolic shelter

    Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist.

    (1973)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Selling ‘cool’: The role of marketing in normalizing domestic air-conditioning in Jordan

      2022, Energy Research and Social Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      More importantly, women's images were used four times more than men's, indicating the intuitive understanding of prescribers of women's key role in normalizing AC at home. However, recent evidence from Jordan suggests women do not readily accept AC in their everyday life and find ways to resist its use [55], which reveals a tension between gendered AC prescriptions for what the good life means for women and how they are not carried over to ordering gendered practices. The fierce competition amidst brands' prescribers to sell their products contained within it a practical understanding for targeting the middle-class using a range of emotional valances and images of women, men, children, and families.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, 1 Scroope Terrace, Cambridge CB2 1PX, United Kingdom.

    View full text