Review
Pyrometallurgical removal of zinc from basic oxygen steelmaking dust – A review of best available technology

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104746Get rights and content

Abstract

Approximately 20 kg of dust and sludges are produced per ton of liquid steel produced via the blast furnaces (BF)/basic oxygen furnace (BOF) production route. Many of these dusts are recycled through the sinter plant or blast furnace route without issue, but high zinc content dusts are routinely landfilled. Hydrometallurgical techniques, such as alkaline leaching, that are often utilized to remove zinc from electric arc furnace dusts are inappropriate for recovery of material from BOS dust due to the lower zinc concentration present and extra post-processing steps to utilize the separated iron product. Pyrometallurgical treatment through a rotary hearth furnace (RHF), in processes such as FASTMET®, can currently be considered as the most commercially attractive option for the processing and recovery of iron and zinc units when employed as part of an integrated steelworks. The crude zinc oxide produced is suitable for sale to zinc smelters, and the direct reduced iron produced provides process benefits through use, such as reduced blast furnace coking rates and increased productivity. The advantages and disadvantages of variations and alternatives are reviewed with regard to future developments.

Introduction

An integrated steelworks, consisting of blast furnaces and a basic oxygen steelmaking facility, is an example of effective materials efficiency in 21st century manufacturing. The most common process for the production of steel is the basic oxygen steelmaking (BOS) process, accounting for well over a billion tons of steel produced globally (World Steel Association, 2017a,b). A significant volume of BOS dust is created as a by-product of the production of liquid steel through the BOS process, which is generally recovered through the off-gas cleaning system. BOS dust is also known as basic oxygen furnace (BOF) dust, BOF fume, or BOS slurry, and varies depending on the origin of the material. For simplicity, this paper defines BOS dust as the fine ferrous by-product produced during the blowing period in an oxygen converter/furnace at a steelmaking facility, which is wet-scrubbed from the off-gas system of the steelmaking plant and will refer to the material as such when citing references using differing nomenclature.

Typically, BOS dust is highly metalized and has iron content (>60 % FeTot) comparable with good quality ores, and therefore could be a valuable secondary source of iron units for an integrated steel plant. While the recirculation of fine iron-bearing materials back into the blast furnace is commonplace, when these materials are contaminated with zinc, the typical process routes become unsuitable. Because the blast furnace process is remarkably sensitive to volatile metals most critically zinc these, zinc-containing materials have been ordinarily disposed of through landfill. The reason for the sensitivity to zinc is that once charged into a blast furnace, any zinc component is reduced to elemental Zn. Due to the low boiling point of the metal (907 °C) compared to the furnace temperature range (1600–1650 °C), the vapor rises back through the furnace stack and re-condenses (Singh, 2012), leading to condensation of scaffolds (accretions) of zinc on the walls of the furnace. These deposits can affect both solid and gas flow through the furnace negatively impacting productivity and risking damage to the furnace lining through burden slips. Zinc is also known to attack refractories in the upper stack of the furnace and therefore potentially impact on campaign life (Narita et al., 1981). As such, the concentration of zinc loaded to a blast furnace is tightly controlled, with levels around 100–120 g/THM generally permissible (THM = tons of hot metal). In context, for a plant producing 10 Mt of liquid steel per annum, this would allow for a maximum 1 kt of zinc to be charged to the furnace per annum if these limits are to be followed. The dilution of zinc bearing wastes and reintegrating them into existing steelmaking processes are therefore not suitable for processing zinc-bearing wastes on a sustainable scale. The volume of zinc re-entering the steelmaking process through galvanized scrap steel recycling is simply too much.

Zinc and iron are routinely married together through the hot-dip galvanization process, with the zinc providing galvanic protection for the steel. It has been postulated that without substantial improvements to the recovery rate of zinc from its industrial uses (principally hot-dip galvanizing) global zinc reserves will be outstripped by demand as early as 2050 (Daigo et al., 2014). It is therefore clear, that without a go-between process to economically remove zinc from the steel material cycle, the process of hot dip galvanizing will be dependent on depleting global reserves of zinc. A number of hydrometallurgical techniques, such as alkaline leaching, are often utilized to remove zinc from electric arc furnace dusts (Lin et al., 2017; Shawabkeh, 2014; Dutra et al., 2006); however, these are inappropriate for recovery of material from BOS dust due to the lower zinc concentration present, in the latter, and extra post-processing steps to utilize the separated iron product. Nevertheless, ammoniacal leaching has been reported to have results for wastes from BOS furnaces where the zinc content is 2.82 % (Gargul and Boryczko, 2015).

There are several emerging novel techniques for the pyrometallurgical separation of zinc from steelmaking dusts, with one of the most promising being rapid microwave carbothermal reduction (Sun et al., 2008) which has advantages such as rapid reaction times (99.99 % Zn removal in 15 min at 1100 W) and feasible capture of a metallic zinc product. Hybridized pyrometallurgical/hydrometallurgical techniques have also been studied such as chlorination roasting followed by a leaching step (Jaafar, 2014). These have advantages in the lower processing temperatures required (750 °C) and hence lower energy input when compared to other pyrometallurgical techniques. However, the disadvantages of a poorly valorized ferrous product and comparatively low Zn removal (97 %) mean upscale is unlikely. These technologies are still in their infancy, having not achieved pilot scale operation as of the time of writing, and as such will not form the main basis of this review – instead focusing more on proven scalable technology and how they might be applied to process BOS dust.

The need to adopt commercial routes to the re-use of zinc waste from BOS dust is part of a broader move to lower the environmental impact of the steel industry (Allwood et al., 2010; Kim and Worrell, 2002) and ensure its economic sustainability (Fisher and Barron, 2019; Lobato et al., 2015). Thus, there are significant incentives to find ways to as much waste as possible. Herein, we review approaches to the re-use of BOS dust, with particular focus on those that provide the best available technology to supplement an integrated steelworks in processing its zinc-bearing by-products, and to make recommendations to the industry based off viability, technical feasibility and environmental considerations. The goal is to ensure that BOS dust is considered a material with potential as resource rather than a waste.

The objective of this paper is to provide a short to medium term outlook for the feasibility of pyrometallurgical separation techniques for BOS dusts. The recycling of low zinc bearing materials is routinely performed at most steel plants through dilution in the blast furnace burden. Very high Zn bearing materials such as Electric Arc Furnace dusts are very well studied and reviewed (Lin et al., 2017; Walburga Keglevich de Buzin et al., 2017) due to the hazardous nature of the material. Materials that are moderately contaminated with Zn such as BOS dust are comparatively understudied, despite the fact they are produced on a far greater scale.

Section snippets

The basic oxygen steelmaking (BOS) process

Basic oxygen steelmaking is the most common production route for steel in the world today (Fig. 1). Immediately following WWII, it became commercially viable to mass produce huge volumes of high purity oxygen for industrial use. This availability of oxygen for use as an oxidizing agent in the steel industry rapidly supplanted the outdated Open-Hearth Furnace, as BOS plants are more productive and require no external heat input due to the extremely exothermic nature of the chemical process. In

BOS dust

The BOS process naturally generates co-products alongside the desired liquid steel, and while the largest by mass of these co-products is steelmaking slag (Fisher and Barron, 2019), the volume of ferrous dusts cannot be ignored. As a consequence of the injection of oxygen into the melt at ultrasonic speeds as well as the turbulent conditions of the bath caused by so-called ‘carbon boil’, a significant amount of fine material is ejected from the bath. This fine material is then scrubbed out of

Characterization of BOS dust

As a potentially valuable ferrous resource, BOS dust from steel plants all around the world has been characterized using a number of different techniques. Although many different monikers are used to describe the material, it is defined in this work as the fine material that is removed from the off-gas system from a BOS vessel, produced during the blowing period.

Pyrometallurgical separation techniques

Based upon a thermodynamic modelling study (Hay and Rankin, 1994) it was proposed that a range of operating regimes and choice of process were feasible for the pyrometallurgical treatment of BOS dust to remove the zinc (and other volatile elements) and reuse the iron as hot metal, metallized clinker or iron oxide clinker. As such pyrometallurgical processes for removal of zinc from steelmaking by-products are somewhat well established and offer some attractive features such as good scalability

Zinc recovery focused pyrometallurgical extraction processes

All of the above-mentioned processes have focused principally on the removal of zinc from an iron product to allow for the iron to be recovered through steelmaking. As such, zinc in every process discussed thus far is recovered as a crude ZnO, usually slightly contaminated by iron dust. This section highlights technologies designed to produce metallic Zn as a primary product.

Due to the much higher zinc content of EAF dust compared with BOS dust, most of this research on value generation from

Next generation ironmaking technology

The ULCOS (Ultra Low CO2 Steelmaking) project’s key technological development in collaboration with Hismelt has been the HIsarna process. This ironmaking technology is a huge paradigm shift from the blast furnace iron production route, and offers numerous potential advantages including dramatic CO2 reductions, high energy efficiency and, most importantly for the discussion in this paper, high raw material flexibility (Meijer et al., 2013).

Currently undergoing pilot scale testing at Tata Steel

Further processing of the crude zinc oxide product

The product of almost every process described in this review is crude zinc oxide powder, which is extracted from the off-gas system of the heat treatment unit. The exceptions to this such as Enviroplas, which utilize a liquid zinc condenser system to recover zinc in the metallic form. Theoretically, an Enviroplas plant would be able to sell recovered zinc with minimal further processing to zinc end users. However, these condensers are not currently operated on a large scale and as the product

Conclusions

The reintegration of zinc bearing by-products of steelmaking persists as a key materials efficiency and environmental issue for steel manufacturers. BOS dust in particular presents a challenge as the zinc content renders it unable to be effectively ‘diluted out’ through reintroduction to existing BF/BOS processing but the value of the zinc content is substantially less than in EAF dust meaning many existing processes use to passivate and/or generate value from EAF dust are not commercially

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

Financial support was provided by Materials and Manufacturing Academy (M2A) that has been made possible through funding from the European Social Fund via the Welsh Government, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), and Tata Steel. Additional support is provided by the Reducing Industrial Carbon Emissions (RICE) operations funded by the Welsh European Funding Office (WEFO) through the Welsh Government.

References (92)

  • S. Kelebek et al.

    Characterization of basic oxygen furnace dust and zinc removal by acid leaching

    Miner. Eng.

    (2004)
  • Y. Kim et al.

    International comparison of CO2 emission trends in the iron and steel industry

    Energy Policy

    (2002)
  • K.R. Krishnamurthy et al.

    Studies on the formation of zinc ferrite

    J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem.

    (1974)
  • B. Lin et al.

    Carbon emissions from energy intensive industry in China: evidence from the iron & steel industry

    Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.

    (2015)
  • X. Lin et al.

    Pyrometallurgical recycling of electric arc furnace dust

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2017)
  • S. Liu et al.

    The formation of kish graphite

    Carbon

    (1991)
  • N.C.C. Lobato et al.

    Management of solid wastes from steelmaking and galvanizing processes: a brief review

    Resour. Conserv. Recy.

    (2015)
  • N. Ma

    Recycling of basic oxygen furnace steelmaking dust by in-process separation of zinc from the dust

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2016)
  • S.A. Mikhail et al.

    Thermal reduction of steel-making secondary materials: I. Basic-oxygen-furnace dust

    Thermochim. Acta.

    (1998)
  • P. Oustadakis et al.

    Hydrometallurgical process for zinc recovery from electric arc furnace dust (EAFD). Part I: characterization and leaching by diluted sulphuric acid

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2010)
  • W. Salama et al.

    Spectroscopic characterization of iron ores formed in different geological environments using FTIR, XPS, Mössbauer spectroscopy and thermoanalyses

    Spectrochim Acta. Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc

    (2015)
  • M.L. Sammut et al.

    Determination of zinc speciation in basic oxygen furnace flying dust by chemical extractions and X-ray spectroscopy

    Chemosphere

    (2008)
  • J. Santos et al.

    Metal-support interactions between iron and titania for catalysts prepared by thermal decomposition of iron pentacarbonyl and by impregnation

    J. Catal.

    (1983)
  • E. Worrell et al.

    Energy efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions reduction opportunities in the US iron and steel sector

    Energy

    (2001)
  • X. Wu et al.

    The effects of additives on the electrowinning of zinc from sulphate solutions with high fluoride concentration

    Hydrometallurgy

    (2014)
  • H. Ahmed

    New trends in the application of carbon-bearing materials in blast furnace iron-making

    Minerals

    (2018)
  • J. Allwood et al.

    Options for achieving a 50% cut in industrial carbon emissions by 2050

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2010)
  • B. Anameric et al.

    Properties and features of direct reduced iron

    Min. Proc. Ext. Met. Rev.

    (2007)
  • G. Assis

    Emerging Pyrometallurgical Processes for Zinc and Lead Recovery From Zinc-bearing Waste Materials. Zinc and Lead Processing Symposium

    (1998)
  • M. Atsushi et al.

    MIDREX processes

    Kobelco Technol. Rev.

    (2010)
  • W.H. Bragg

    The structure of magnetite and the spinels

    Nature

    (1915)
  • D.A. Brandt et al.

    Metallurgy Fundamentals. Goodheart-Wilcox

    (2005)
  • A. Chatterjee

    Sponge Iron Production by Direct Reduction of Iron Oxide

    (2012)
  • R.J. Dry et al.

    HIsmelt – the future in direct ironmaking

    Ironmaking Conference

    (1999)
  • R.J. Fruehan

    New steelmaking processes: drivers, requirements and potential impact

    Ironmak. Steelmak.

    (2005)
  • K. Gargul et al.

    Alkaline leaching of low zinc content iron-bearing sludges

    Arch. Metall. Mater.

    (2016)
  • F. Goetz

    The Mechanism of B.O.F. Fume Formation. Thesis, MEng

    (1980)
  • X.X. Gritzan et al.

    Rates and mechanisms of dust generation in oxygen steelmaking

    Steel Res.

    (2001)
  • I. Hahn et al.

    Ejection of steel and slag droplets from gas stirred steel melts

    Ironmak. Steelmak.

    (2002)
  • R.H. Hanewald et al.

    Processing steel wastes pyrometallurgically at INMETCO

    Min. Metall. Explor.

    (1992)
  • Heinrich, T., 2015. Thesis, PhD. Cardiff...
  • H.C. Henschen

    Wet vs dry gas cleaning in the steel industry

    J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc.

    (1968)
  • L.E. Holappa et al.

    Comparison of different coal based direct reduction processes. Technical Report, Helsinki Univ. of Technology, Otaniemi (Finland)

    Mat. Sci. Metall.

    (2000)
  • B.J. Hoskins et al.

    A new look at the cause of fuming

    JOM

    (1966)
  • HRDC, Horsehead Resource Development Co., Inc. Flame Reactor Technology Description....
  • N. Ishiwata et al.

    Investigation of reduction and smelting mechanism in the Hi-QIP process

    Steel Res. Int.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text