Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T20:31:42.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Lawyering Toolkit: a supportive tool to close the legal literacy gap between learners and practice professionals – a proof-of-concept report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2023

Abstract

Three academic and one law firm librarian, Susan Boyle, Virginia Conrick, Pattie Punch, and Ann O'Sullivan collaborated to create a ‘Lawyering Toolkit’. It was devised to support learners on the legal lifecycle from higher education to the corporate sphere and beyond. Arranged by skills level, it was imagineered via the online BIALL Irish Group meetings during the Covid pandemic. Learning steps were visually scaffolded in LibGuides to build a quick reference platform. This article describes how the Toolkit proof-of-concept developed through experiential reflection and shared discussion. It tracks the construction of a prototype to presentation at BIALL Conference 2022 and incorporates feedback from the conference and the BIALL Irish Group. It is envisaged that the Lawyering Toolkit will ensure a more collaborative and consistent approach to legal information literacy in the Republic of Ireland.

Type
Main Features
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by British and Irish Association of Law Librarians

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anstey, L. and Watson, G. “A Rubric for Evaluating E-Learning Tools in Higher Education”, Educause Review (2018). Available at <https://er.educause.edu/articles/2018/9/a-rubric-for-evaluating-e-learning-tools-in-higher-education> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
Association of College & Research LibrariesRoles and strengths of teaching librarians” (2017). Available at <www.ala.org/acrl/standards/teachinglibrarians> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
Aston, J. “The BIALL Irish Group” Legal Information Management (2019) 114-117. doi:10.1017/S147266961900029X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. L. “Designing LibGuides as Instructional Tools for Critical Thinking and Effective Online Learning”, Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning (2014) 107117. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2014.944423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrom-Lynch, Y. “LibGuides by Design: Using Instructional Design Principles and User-Centered Studies to Develop Best Practices”, Public Services Quarterly (2019) 205223. doi:10.1080/15228959.2019.1632245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovill, C. Co-Creating Learning and Teaching: Towards Relational Pedagogy in Higher Education ( St Albans: Critical Publishing, 2020).Google Scholar
Brunschwig, C. R.Visual Law and Legal Design: Questions and Tentative Answers”, in Schweighofer, E. et al., (eds.) Cybergovernance. (Bern: Editions Weblaw 2021) 179-230. Available at <www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/200875/> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
Brush, D. “Case Study: Does Following Best Practices Increase LibGuides Usage?”, Journal of Web Librarianship, (2022) 189199. doi:10.1080/19322909.2022.2112798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAST, (2018) “Universal Design for Learning Guidelines”. Available at <www.cast.org/impact/universal-design-for-learning-udl> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
CILIP, (2012) “Continuing Professional Development”. Available at <www.cilip.org.uk/jobs-careers/training/cpd/pages/default.aspx> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
Corrall, S., “Crossing the threshold: reflective practice in information literacy development”, Journal of Information Literacy (2017) 2353. Available at <http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/28240/> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
Cox, A., “How Artificial Intelligence Might Change Academic Library Work: Applying the Competencies Literature and the Theory of the Professions”, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2023) 74(3), 367380. doi:10.1002/asi.24635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C.. and Tzoc, E., “ChatGPT: Implications for Academic Libraries”, College & Research Libraries News: Special Issue (2023) 99. doi: 10.5860/crln.84.3.99.Google Scholar
Crosslin, M., “Conceptualising and Designing Self-Mapped Learning Pathways Courses to Encourage Learner Agency and Equity”, Unleashing the Power of Learner Agency (2021). Available at <https://edtechbooks.org/up> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
Dempsey, A., and Heil, C., “Agile Library Instruction: Piloting Collaboratively-Created Information Literacy Modules”, Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning (2021)187-203. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2021.1961967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dervin, B., “Sense-making Theory and Practice: An Overview of User Interests in Knowledge Seeking and Use”, Journal of Knowledge Management (1998) 36-46. doi:10.1108/13673279810249369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, J.C. and Lowenthal, P.R., “Getting graphic about infographics: design lessons learned from popular infographics”, Journal of Visual Literacy (2016) 42-59. doi:10.1080/1051144X.2016.1205832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenall, J., J. and B.A. Sen, “Reflective Practice in the Library and Information sector”, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science (2016) 137-150. doi:10.1177/0961000614551450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, D. and Terrell, M., “Bridging the Gap Between University and Practice: Findings from a Study on Legal Research Education”, Legal Information Management (2019) 131-137. doi: 10.1017/S1472669619000379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IFLA Satellite Conference, (2023) “Agile methodology in libraries: innovations in library projects and management”. Available at <www.eur.nl/en/library/ifla/agile-methodology-libraries> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
Lee, Y.Y. and Lowe, M.S., (2018) “Building Positive Learning Experiences through Pedagogical Research Guide Design”, Journal of Web Librarianship (2018) 12(14), 205231. doi:10.1080/19322909.2018.1499453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legal Education and Training Review, (2013) “Setting Standards: The Future of Legal Services Education and Training in England and Wales”. Available at <https://letr.org.uk/the-report/index.html> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
Malamed, C., (2023) “The eLearning Coach: ELearning Design chunking-information”. Available at <https://theelearningcoach.com/elearning_design/chunking-information/> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
Martin, F. and Bolliger, D.U., “Designing online learning in Higher Education” in Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education, (2023) 1217-1236. Available at < https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_72> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
Nind, M., “A New Application for the Concept of Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Teaching Advanced Social Science Research Methods”, Oxford Review of Education (2020) 185-201. doi:10.1080/03054985.2019.1644996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nind, M. and Lewthwaite, S., “Methods That Teach: Developing Pedagogic Research Methods, Developing Pedagogy”, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, (2018) 41(4), 398410. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2018.1427057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, S.H. and Clement, K.A., “One Step at a Time: A Case Study of Incorporating Universal Design for Learning in Library Instruction”, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Innovative Pedagogy (2020). Available at <https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/sotl_ip/vol2/iss1/3/> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
Porter, E.G., “Imagining Law: Visual Thinking Across the Law School Curriculum”, Journal of Legal Education, (2018) 68(1) 8-14. Available at <www.jstor.org/stable/26890990> Accessed 26 April 2023.Google Scholar
Schwieder, D., “Low-Effort Information Searching: The Heuristic Information-Seeking Toolkit, Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian (2016) 171-187. doi:10.1080/01639269.2017.1289019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D.A., The Reflective Practitioner: how professionals think in action (London: Temple, 1991).Google Scholar
SHIFT, (2023) “The Rapid Rise of eLearning Pathways”. Available at <www.shiftelearning.com/blog/the-rapid-rise-of-learning-pathways> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
Springshare, (2023) “Springshare website”. Available at <https://springshare.com/libguides/> Accessed: 26 April 2023.+Accessed:+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar
Susskind, R.E., Tomorrow's lawyers: an introduction to your future (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Talley, N.B., “Imagining the Use of Intelligent Agents and Artificial Intelligence in Academic Law Libraries”, Law Library Journal, (2016) 108(3), 383-401. Available at <www.aallnet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/vol-108-no-3-Imagining-the-Use-of-Intelligent-Agents-and-Artificial-Intelligence-in-Academic-Law-Libraries.pdf> Accessed 26 April 2023.Google Scholar
Thanaraj, A. and Gledhill, K., (2022) Teaching Legal Education in the Digital Age: Pedagogical Practices to Digitally Empower Law Graduates (Milton: Taylor & Francis Group, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations, “Sustainable Development Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all” (2023). Available at <https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4> Accessed 26 April 2023.+Accessed+26+April+2023.>Google Scholar