ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

The ‘New’ Climate Activism: Contemporary Trajectories and Political Consequences

Participation
Policy
VIRTUAL022
Joost de Moor
Sciences Po Paris
Katrin Uba
Uppsala Universitet

Since late 2018, a global wave of mobilization under the banners of Fridays For Future (FFF) and Extinction Rebellion (XR) has injected new energy into global climate politics. FFF and XR took the world by storm, but have now been forced into (partial) latency as a result of Covid-19. We believe this moment presents an opportunity for reflection. In particular, FFF, XR and other recent campaigns like the Sunrise Movement have been depicted as ‘new’ forms of climate activism. However, this presumed newness calls for closer investigation. This workshop will therefore reflect on the distinctiveness and effects of the ‘new climate activism’ as compared to previous climate campaigns. Does it bring new or similar constituencies to the streets? How new are its tactics? Is it driven by new goals and ideas? And are the political consequences of this mobilization different from prior climate movement achievements? Despite significant interest in political activism and environmental politics, ECPR Joint Sessions have yet to focus specifically on climate activism. By filling that gap, the workshop expands on previous research on climate movement participation, strategies, goals and consequences. Regarding participation, previous research shows that climate activism is biased towards privileged social strata (Rootes & Brulle 2013). How can the new climate activism introduce more equality? Regarding strategy, previous research reveals the dilemmas climate activists often face, such as that spaces that are good for mobilizing (e.g., climate summits) have limited opportunities to exert influence (de Moor 2018). How can the new climate activism overcome such dilemmas? Regarding goals, prior research has discussed tensions between climate justice and less political framings (Wahlström et al. 2013). How do these tensions play out in the new climate activism? Regarding political outcomes, previous research demonstrates that while climate movements have successfully raised public concern, the gap between climate scientists’ advice and government action remains substantial (Rootes & Nulman 2015). How can the new climate activism help bridge that gap? While based in the political sociology of climate activism, this workshop explicitly aims to reach beyond social movement studies by inviting those with a broader interest in environmental politics to discuss how climate politics more generally have led to, and are affected by, the new climate activism. Here, contributions from e.g. scholars working on political parties and public opinion are particularly welcome. Moreover, the workshop invites discussions of parallel processes that should potentially be understood in conjunction with current changes in climate activism. For instance, discussions on the role of climate science and alternative ways of knowing continue to be relevant in the new climate activism. How do these debates relate to struggles around power and knowledge in climate politics more generally? Furthermore, by acknowledging that climate change can be seen as part of a more general ecological crisis, we welcome contributions on broader environmental mobilization as well, if they speak to the question of a ‘new’ green movement. Finally, while the workshop focuses on a clear empirical phenomenon, we welcome strong theoretical contributions as well.

This workshop speaks directly to the sub-disciplines of social movement studies and environmental politics. We therefore expect our workshop to be of particular interest to members of several ECPR Standing Groups, including Green Politics, Participation and Mobilization, Citizenship, Political Sociology, and Interest Groups. As explained, we also expect the workshop will be relevant to specific subsections of communities working on political parties and public opinion. We firstly expect contributions from a wide range of social movement scholars across Europe and beyond. Climate activism is currently one of, if not the, most salient topic in this sub-discipline. For example, over the course of 2019, we have coordinated a worldwide survey of participants in FFF and XR demonstrations, bringing together between 50 and 100 researchers in the various national teams involved (Wahlström et al. 2019; de Moor et al. 2020). While many outstanding researchers from this network can be expected to apply for participation in this joint session, our selection of participants will be strictly based on merit and breadth of topics. We believe that the broader scholarly community currently working on climate activism is within our reach and ready to deliver numerous high-quality paper proposals to the workshop. On top of that, we notice that scholars of environmental politics are increasingly aware of the centrality of the (new) climate movement as an actor in their field of study. Throughout many discussions and presentations, we have recently experienced increasingly that social movement studies and environmental politics are finding each other in a joint effort to answer some of the most pressing questions of our time: what role can citizens play in addressing climate change when political institutions have clear limitations in doing so? We therefore believe that the time is ripe for a workshop dedicated to bringing these communities together around an effort to understand the distinctiveness of the new climate activism and its impact. We welcome in particular papers that address the (lack of) distinctiveness of the new climate activism, and relate this issue to the (potential) impact of the movement on climate politics. In short: how is the new climate activism distinct, and does its distinctiveness hold in it a promise to get closer to resolving the climate crisis than its activist predecessors or other climate actors have done? Depending on the quality and coherence of the presented papers, a collective publication will be considered.

Papers will be avaliable once proposal and review has been completed.