Skip to main content

The Punters' Guide to Democracy

What it is, Sadly; and What it Could be, Gladly

  • Book
  • © 2022

Overview

  • Discusses the multiple ways of voting in a democratic system
  • Shows that binary decision-making is blunt, primitive, divisive, and sometimes inaccurate
  • Highlights the more inclusive and effective voting procedures

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (7 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

This book discusses multiple ways of voting in a democratic system and explains the basis of more consensual politics. Without delving into too much technical argument or too many mathematical examples, it aims to

  • show that binary decision-making is blunt, primitive, divisive, and sometimes inaccurate;
  • prove that other methodologies are more accurate and, therefore, more democratic;
  • highlight more inclusive and effective voting procedures;
  • discuss electoral reforms for national parliaments and international forums like the UN Security Council and COP26/27.

The book is written not just for academia, or for the politicians and journalists, or for other specialists; it is for the general public: for students still at school, for voters in society at large, and for activists in umpteen NGOs.

“…the West's relentless pursuit of binary voting… has been a cause of countless tragedies. This book is brilliant: political controversies should rarely if ever be 'resolved' by majority vote.”

Arend Lijphart, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of California, San Diego

“[for] those who do not believe in a black-or-white world… a very important and extremely timely contribution…”

Věra Stojarová, Associate Professor of Political Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

“Peter’s challenge to the binary “win-lose” approach is urgently necessary, as is his proposal for an eminently more reasonable, accountable, and participatory system.”

Dr. Valery Perry, Democratization Policy Council, Sarajevo

“…the preferential points vote… would be the more accurate way to make decisions, and the consequences far more peaceful.”

Lord Boyce, House of Lords

“He builds a case for a specific version of preferential procedure, not only for elections, but for decision making as well.”

Hannu Nurmi, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of Turku, Finland

“A particularly strong plea in favour of voting procedures… which go far beyond the usual 'yes or no' ballots. [He uses] an alert prose and a wealth of illuminating and easily graspable examples.”

Maurice Salles, Emeritus Professor, Université de Caen Normandie

Reviews

“The Punter’s Guide, he gives a survey of voting and of decision making processes and systems … . He looks beyond just ‘western’ practices ... he makes it easy to understand through explanation as well as his engaging style of writing. Throughout his work he offers a different model for elections or other decisionmaking processes. ... Emerson’s long history of work on this issue remains evergreen, and the tools being freely offered online remove any excuses … .” (Valery Perry, democratizationpolicy.org, October, 2023) “…the West's relentless pursuit of binary voting… has been a cause of countless tragedies. This book is brilliant: political controversies should rarely if ever be 'resolved' by majority vote.”

Arend Lijphart, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of California, San Diego

“[for] those who do not believe in a black-or-white world… a very important and extremely timely contribution…”

Věra Stojarová, Associate Professor of Political Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

“Peter’s challenge to the binary “win-lose” approach is urgently necessary, as is his proposal for an eminently more reasonable, accountable, and participatory system.”

Dr. Valery Perry, Democratization Policy Council, Sarajevo

“…the preferential points vote… would be the more accurate way to make decisions, and the consequences far more peaceful.”

Lord Boyce, House of Lords

“He builds a case for a specificversion of preferential procedure, not only for elections, but for decision making as well.”

Hannu Nurmi, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of Turku, Finland

“A particularly strong plea in favour of voting procedures… which go far beyond the usual 'yes or no' ballots. [He uses] an alert prose and a wealth of illuminating and easily graspable examples.”

Maurice Salles, Emeritus Professor, Université de Caen Normandie

Authors and Affiliations

  • The de Borda Institute, Belfast, UK

    Peter Emerson

About the author



Peter Emerson is Director of the Belfast-based international NGO "The de Borda Institute" (Ireland). He has campaigned for inclusive governance since 1978. His publications include From Majority Rule to Inclusive Politics (Springer, 2016), Defining Democracy: Voting Procedures in Decision-Making, Elections and Governance (2nd ed. in 2012, Springer), Majority Voting as a Catalyst of Populism (Springer, 2020), and Designing an All-Inclusive Democracy: Consensual Voting Procedures for Use in Parliaments, Councils and Committees (Springer, 2007).


Bibliographic Information

Publish with us