Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Solidarity and Social Justice in Contemporary Societies pp 53–64Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

The Philosophy of Social Justice and Welfare Provision: Towards Capacitating Solidarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Solidarity and social justice underlying the welfare state are shifting. Post-war welfare states, built on Rawl’s conception of social justice, effectively mitigated the social risks of industrial economies. Today, ‘new social risks’ display themselves in unequal opportunities to successfully manage life course transitions (e.g., in health, labour market access, work-family balance). In response, the social investment perspective took root around the millennium, marked by a relative shift from compensatory social security to ‘capacitating’ welfare provisions. This social investment model can be grounded in a conception of ‘stepping-stone’ solidarity that summons a more contextualized conception of social justice in terms of capabilities. This subsequently contributes to a rethinking of the welfare state that builds on and supports its classic distributive and insurance functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, E. (2010). Justifying the capabilities approach to justice. In H. Brighouse & I. Robeyns (Eds.), Measuring justice: Primary goods and capabilities (pp. 81–100). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, N. (2020). The Economics of the Welfare State. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, W. H. (1944). Full employment in a free society: A report. Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchi, L., Genschel, P., Hemerijck, A., & Nasr, M. (2020). EU solidarity in times of Covid-19 (Policy Briefs, 2020/34, European Governance and Politics Programme). European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claassen, R. (2018). Capabilities in a just society: A theory of navigational agency. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, H., Bonvin, J.-M., Vielle, P., & Farvaque, N. (2005). Developing capabilities and rights in welfare-to-work policies. European Societies, 7(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, M. (2017). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A., & Myles, J. (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A. (2013). Changing welfare states. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A. (2017). The uses of social investment. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A. (2018). Social investment as a policy paradigm. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(6), 810–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A. (2020). Correlates of capacitating solidarity. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(3), 278–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A., & Huguenot-Noël, R. (2022). Resilient Welfare States in the European Union. Agenda Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A., & Matsaganis, M. (2022). Stress-testing the welfare state. Lessons from the great recession for a post-pandemic social compass. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, P., Kemp, A., & Varady, D. P. (2005). Housing vouchers in the United States, Great Britain, and the Netherlands: Current issues and future perspectives. Housing Policy Debate, 16(3–4), 575–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (1998). The paradox of redistribution and the strategy of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality and poverty in the western countries. American Sociological Review, 63(5), 661–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1963). Sociology at the crossroads and other essays. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies, challenges. Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1990). Aristotelian social democracy. In G. M. Mara & H. S. Richardson (Eds.), Liberalism and the good. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1992). Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political theory, 20(2), 202–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1999). Women and equality: The capabilities approach. International Labour Review, 138(3), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2009). Creating capabilities: The human development approach and its implementation. Hypatia, 24(3), 211–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plavgo, I., & Hemerijck, A. (2020). The social investment litmus test: Family formation, employment and poverty. Journal of European Social Policy. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928720950627.

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2017). Wellbeing, freedom and social justice: The capability approach re-examined. Open Book Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (1998). Just institutions matter: The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C., & Simon, W. H. (2017). The management side of due process in the service-based welfare state. In N. R. Parrillo (Ed.), Administrative law from the inside out: Essays on themes in the work of Jerry L. Mashaw (pp. 63–86). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C., Zeitlin, J., & Quack, S. (2017). Capacitating services and the bottom-up approach to social investment. In A. Hemerijck (Ed.), The uses of social investment (pp. 140–149). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Allan Lane.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Retrieved July 24, 2021, from https://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/finances/presse/dossiers_de_presse/090914mesure_perf_eco_progres_social/synthese_ang.pdf

  • Sugden, R. (1993). Welfare, resources and capabilities: A review of Inequality reexamined by Amartya Sen. Journal of Economic Literature, 31(4), 1947–1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J., & de-Shalit, A. (2007). Disadvantage. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy

    Anton Hemerijck, Azizjon Bagadirov & Pablo Puertas Roig

Authors
  1. Anton Hemerijck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Azizjon Bagadirov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pablo Puertas Roig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Hemerijck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Mara A. Yerkes

  2. Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Michèlle Bal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hemerijck, A., Bagadirov, A., Puertas Roig, P. (2022). The Philosophy of Social Justice and Welfare Provision: Towards Capacitating Solidarity. In: Yerkes, M.A., Bal, M. (eds) Solidarity and Social Justice in Contemporary Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93795-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93795-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93794-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93795-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation