Abstract
Compulsory education is the only arena where all children and young adults can be reached. It is also an arena where all countries have developed national curricula with minimum requirements for what the students are to learn based on assumptions of what it means to be a good citizen in a highly dynamic and globalized world. What these assumptions are can be found at policy levels, such as white papers and curricula. The national policies dictate social changes, and national and international assessments measure the extent of changes. Examples of expected social changes through education are increased democratic participation, improved mental and physical health, increased collaboration, improved creative skills, increased critical thinking, sustainable development, and decreased fallout rates in senior high schools. This chapter explains types of social change that compulsory education aims at, with examples from a Scandinavian context, and discusses the extent to which the social changes apply to all students. The Scandinavian ideal is that education ought to apply to all students and take place through variation and adaptations to the diversity of the student group within the community. Through various arenas, education should give all students the opportunity to develop and to learn. The aim of the chapter is to understand social change through adaptive and differentiated education for all students. However, a particular focus is on multicultural and multilingual students and gifted students, since these are examples of marginalized groups in the current practice of educational policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Arnesen, A.-L., & Lundahl, L. (2006). Still social and democratic? Inclusive education policies in the Nordic welfare states. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 285–300.
Berge, Ø., & Hyggen, C. (2011). Privatskoler i Norden. Omfang, utvikling og den politiske debatten [Private schools in the Nordic countries. Extent, development, and the political debate]. FAFO report: https://www.fafo.no/media/com_netsukii/10122.pdf
Berger, S. (2006). College planning for gifted students: Choosing and getting into the right college. Prufrock Press.
Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (1991). Education, economy and social change. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 1(1–2), 3–23.
Carlgren, I., Klette, K., Myrdal, S., Schnack, K., & Simola, H. (2006). Changes in Nordic teaching practices: From individualized teaching to teaching of individuals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 301–326.
Crocker, T. (2004). Underachievement: Is our vision too narrowed and blinkered? Fools step in where angels fear to tread. Gifted, 131, 10–14.
Dewey, J. (1916/2011). Democracy and education. Simon & Brown.
Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2006). Balancing opportunities for learning and practicing for gifted students. Curriculum Matters, 5(1), 3–5.
Diezmann, C. M., Watters, J. J., & Fox, K. (2001). Early entry to school in Australia: Rhetoric research and reality. Australian Journal of Gifted Education, 10(2), 5–18.
Dixon, L. Q., Zhao, J., Shin, J.-Y., Wu, S., Su, J.-H., Burgess-Brigham, R., Gezer, M. U., & Snow, C. (2012). What we know about second language acquisition: A synthesis from four perspectives. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 5–60.
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131–149.
Idsøe, E. C. (2014). Elever med akademisk talent i skolen [Gifted students with academic abilities]. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Idsøe, E. C., & Skogen, K. (2011). Våre evnerike barn. En utfordring for skolen [Our gifted children. A challenge for schools]. Høyskoleforlaget.
Kesner, J. E. (2005). Gifted children’s relationships with teachers. International Education Journal, 6(2), 218–223.
Krause, K., Bochner, S., Duchesne, S. (2003). Educational psychology for learning and teaching.. Thomson.
Matthews, M. S. (2006). Gifted students who drop out: New evidence from a Southeastern state. Roeper Review, 28, 216–223.
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144–154.
Mönks, F. J., & Ypenburg, I. H. (2006). Vores barn er højt begavet: En vejledning for forældre og lærere [Our child is gifted. A guidebook for parents]. Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.
NOU. (2016). Official Norwegian Reports 2016:14. Mer å hente- bedre læring for elever med stort læringspotensial [More to gain – Better learning for gifted students]. Norwegian Government Security and Service Organization.
NOU. (2019). Official Norwegian Reports 2019: 3. Nye sjanser – bedre læring. Kjønnsforskjeller i skoleprestasjoner og utdanningsløp. [New chances – Better learning. Gender differences in school achievement and school trajectory]. Norwegian Government Security and Service Organization.
Sohr, I. (2012). Empowering education- critical teaching for social change. University of Chicago Press.
Tägtström, J., & Olsen, T. (2016). Nordic projects to combat school dropout- Good practice in helping young people complete upper secondary education. Nordic Welfare Centre. Downloaded from: https://nordicwelfare.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/NordicProjectstoCombat_webb.pdf
Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 45–59). Allyn & Bacon.
Telhaug, A. O. (1966). Er vi på vei mot en felles nordisk skoleordning? [Towards a joint Nordic school system?]. Prismet, 7, 193–201.
United Nations Development Program. (2020). Human development reports: Human Development Index (HDI) ranking. Downloaded from Human Development Data Center | Human Development Reports (undp.org).
Westheimer, J. (2015). What kind of citizen? Educating our children for the common good. Teachers College Press.
Wiborg, S. (2009). Education and social integration. Comprehensive schooling in Europa. Palgrave Macmillan.
Winner, E. (2009). Toward broadening our understanding of giftedness: The spatial domain. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the life span (pp. 75–85). American Psychological Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Burner, T., Svendsen, B. (2022). Social Change Through Education: A Scandinavian Approach. In: Baikady, R., Sajid, S., Nadesan, V., Przeperski, J., Rezaul, I., Gao, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Change . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87624-1_241-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87624-1_241-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87624-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87624-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences