Prof. dr. S. (Shaul) Shalvi
Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde
Sectie Microeconomics
Bezoekadres
- Roetersstraat 11
- Kamernummer: 7.29
Postadres
-
Postbus 15867
1001 NJ Amsterdam
Contactgegevens
-
Profiel
Shaul Shalvi is a professor of Behavioural Ethics at the Center for Research in Experimental Economics and political Decision making (CREED ), Amsterdam School of Economics. He serve as an Associate Editor at Judgment and Decision Making.
Behavioural ethics is the empirical study of ethical questions. We study topics like fairness, equality, values and norms. That is, how people behave when their decisions and actions impact others. At the moment, our lab is focused on understanding the psychological factors influencing people's behaviour when using sharing economy platforms. We are especially interested to figure out how responsible sharing can be encouraged and maintained.
For additional information: https://behavioralethics.org/
-
Publicaties
- refereed (72)
- wetenschappelijk (8)
- vakpublicatie (1)
- erkenning (39)
- supervised theses (2)
- proefschrift (1)
- working papers / preprints (1)
- datasets (4)
2024
- Vu, M. L., Molho, C., Soraperra, I., Fiedler, S., & Shalvi, S. (2024). Giving (in) to help an identified person. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 110, Article 104557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104557
2023
Dorrough, A., Köbis, N. C., Irlenbusch, B., Shalvi, S., & Glockner, A. (2023). Conditional bribery: Insights from incentivized experiments across 18 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209731120- Soraperra, I., Köbis, N., Shalvi, S., Vogt, S., Efferson, C., & Offerman, T. (2023). A market for integrity. The use of competition to reduce bribery in education. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 107, Article 102110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102110 [details]
- Soraperra, I., van der Weele, J., Villeval, M.-C., & Shalvi, S. (2023). The Social Construction of Ignorance: Experimental Evidence. Games and Economic Behavior, 138, 197-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2022.12.002 [details]
- Vu, M. L., Soraperra, I., Leib, M., van der Weele, J. J., & Shalvi, S. (2023). Ignorance by Choice: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Underlying Motives of Wilful Ignorance and Its Consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 149(9-10), 611-635. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000398
2022
- Dimant, E., & Shalvi, S. (2022). Meta-nudging honesty: Past, present, and future of the research frontier. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, Article 101426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101426 [details]
- Shalvi, S., Mol, J. M., Molho, C., Vu, L., Leib, M., & Soraperra, I. (2022). Psychological science for a responsible sharing economy. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 100-105. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.032 [details]
- Steinel, W., Valtcheva, K., Gross, J., Celse, J., Max, S., & Shalvi, S. (2022). (Dis)honesty in the face of uncertain gains or losses. Journal of Economic Psychology, 90, Article 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2022.102487 [details]
- Weisel, O., & Shalvi, S. (2022). Moral currencies: Explaining corrupt collaboration. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 270-274. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.034 [details]
2021
- Gordon-Hecker, T., Schneider, I. K., Shalvi, S., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2021). Leaving with something: When do people experience an equity-efficiency conflict? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34(2), 213-227. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2205 [details]
- Köbis, N. C., Soraperra, I., & Shalvi, S. (2021). The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework. Journal of Management, 47(1), 317-343. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320967740 [details]
- Larkin, I., Pierce, L., Shalvi, S., & Tenbrunsel, A. (2021). The opportunities and challenges of behavioral field research on misconduct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 166, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.06.004 [details]
- Leib, M., Köbis, N. C., Francke, M., Shalvi, S., & Roskes, M. (2021). Precision in a Seller’s Market: Round Asking Prices Lead to Higher Counteroffers and Selling Prices. Management Science, 67(2), 1048-1055. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3570 [details]
- Leib, M., Köbis, N., Soraperra, I., Weisel, O., & Shalvi, S. (2021). Collaborative Dishonesty: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(12), 1241-1268. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000349 [details]
- Vainapel, S., Shani, Y., & Shalvi, S. (2021). Motivated Interpretations of Deceptive Information. Brain Sciences, 11(3), Article 297. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11030297 [details]
- Van Doesum, N. J., Murphy, R. O., Gallucci, M., Aharonov-Majar, E., Athenstaedt, U., Au, W. T., Bai, L., Boehm, R., Bovina, I., Buchan, N. R., Chen, X-P., Dumont, K. B., Engelmann, J. B., Eriksson, K., Euh, H., Fiedler, S., Friesen, J., Gaechter, S., Garcia, C., ... Shalvi, S. (2021). Correction for Van Doesum et al., Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(47), Article e2118687118. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118687118
- Van Doesum, N. J., Murphy, R. O., Gallucci, M., Aharonov-Majar, E., Athenstaedt, U., Au, W. T., Bai, L., Böhm, R., Bovina, I., Buchan, N. R., Chen, X-P., Dumont, K. B., Engelmann, J. B., Eriksson, K., Euh, H., Fiedler, S., Friesen, J., Gächter, S., Garcia, C., ... Van Lange, P. A. M. (2021). Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(35), Article e2023846118. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023846118 [details]
2020
- Bereby-Meyer, Y., Hayakawa , S., Shalvi, S., Corey , J. D., Costa, A., & Keysar, B. (2020). Honesty Speaks a Second Language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(2), 632-643. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12360 [details]
- Dimant, E., van Kleef, G. A., & Shalvi, S. (2020). Requiem for a Nudge: Framing effects in nudging honesty. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 172, 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.02.015 [details]
- Gordon-Hecker, T., Pittarello, A., Shalvi, S., & Roskes, M. (2020). Buy-one-get-one-free deals attract more attention than percentage deals. Journal of Business Research, 111, 128-134. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.070 [details]
- Haran, U., & Shalvi, S. (2020). The Implicit Honesty Premium: Why Honest Advice Is More Persuasive Than Highly Informed Advice. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 149(4), 757-773. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000677 [details]
- Irlenbusch, B., Mussweiler, T., Saxler, D. J., Shalvi, S., & Weiss, A. (2020). Similarity increases collaborative cheating. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 178, 148-173. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.06.022 [details]
2019
- Celse, J., Max, S., Steinel, W., Soraperra, I., & Shalvi, S. (2019). Uncertain lies: How payoff uncertainty affects dishonesty. Journal of Economic Psychology, 71, 117-125. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.09.003 [details]
- Köbis, N. C., Verschuere, B., Bereby-Meyer, Y., Rand, D., & Shalvi, S. (2019). Intuitive Honesty Versus Dishonesty: Meta-Analytic Evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 778-796. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619851778 [details]
- Leib, M., Moran, S., & Shalvi, S. (2019). Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(4), 423–439. http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190419/jdm190419.html [details]
- Leib, M., Pittarello, A., Gordon-Hecker, T., Shalvi, S., & Roskes, M. (2019). Loss framing increases self-serving mistakes (but does not alter attention). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, Article 103880. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103880 [details]
- Shalvi, S. (2019). Financial temptation increases civic honesty. Science, 365(6448), 29-30. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax5034 [details]
- Vainapel, S., Weisel, O., Zultan, R., & Shalvi, S. (2019). Group moral discount: Diffusing blame when judging group members. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(2), 212-228. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2106 [details]
2018
- Gross, J., Leib, M., Offerman, T., & Shalvi, S. (2018). Ethical Free Riding: When Honest People Find Dishonest Partners. Psychological Science, 29(12), 1956-1968. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618796480 [details]
- Verschuere, B., Köbis, N. C., Bereby-Meyer, Y., Rand, D., & Shalvi, S. (2018). Taxing the Brain to Uncover Lying? Meta-analyzing the Effect of Imposing Cognitive Load on the Reaction-Time Costs of Lying. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(3), 462-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.04.005 [details]
2017
- Bassarak, C., Leib, M., Mischkowski, D., Strang, S., Glöckner, A., & Shalvi, S. (2017). What Provides Justification for Cheating: Producing or Observing Counterfactuals? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(4), 964-975. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2013 [details]
- Gordon-Hecker, T., Choshen-Hillel, S., Shalvi, S., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2017). Resource Allocation Decisions: When Do We Sacrifice Efficiency in the Name of Equity? In M. Li, & D. P. Tracer (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Fairness, Equity, and Justice (pp. 93–105). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58993-0_6 [details]
- Gordon-Hecker, T., Rosensaft-Eshel, D., Pittarello, A., Shalvi, S., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2017). Not taking responsibility: Equity trumps efficiency in allocation decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 146(6), 771-775. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000273 [details]
- Soraperra, I., Weisel, O., Zultan, R., Kochavi, S., Leib, M., Shalev, H., & Shalvi, S. (2017). The bad consequences of teamwork. Economics Letters, 160, 12-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.08.011 [details]
- Sznycer, D., Lopez Seal, M. F., Sell, A., Lim, J., Porat, R., Shalvi, S., Halperin, E., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2017). Support for redistribution is shaped by compassion, envy, and self-interest, but not a taste for fairness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(31), 8420-8425. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703801114 [details]
2016
- Fine, A., van Rooij, B., Feldman, Y., Shalvi, S., Scheper, E., Leib, M., & Cauffman, E. (2016). Rule orientation and behavior: Development and validation of a scale measuring individual acceptance of rule violation. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 22(3), 314-329. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000096 [details]
- Lelieveld, G-J., Shalvi, S., & Crone, E. A. (2016). Lies that feel honest: Dissociating between incentive and deviance processing when evaluating dishonesty. Biological Psychology, 117, 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.03.009 [details]
- Rilke, R. M., Schurr, A., Barkan, R., & Shalvi, S. (2016). One-by-one or all-at-once? Self-reporting policies and dishonesty. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 113. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00113 [details]
- Shalvi, S. (2016). Corruption corrupts. Nature, 531(7595), 456-457. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17307 [details]
- Shalvi, S., Weisel, O., Kochavi-Gamliel, S., & Leib, M. (2016). Corrupt collaboration: A behavioral ethics approach. In J.-W. van Prooijen, & P. A. M. van Lange (Eds.), Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment: The Roots of Dishonesty (pp. 134-148). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316225608.009 [details]
- Sznycer, D., Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., Porat, R., Shalvi, S., & Halperin, E. (2016). Shame closely tracks the threat of devaluation by others, even across cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(10), 2625-2630. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514699113 [details]
2015
- Bereby-Meyer, Y., & Shalvi, S. (2015). Deliberate honesty. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 195-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.004 [details]
- Gino, F., & Shalvi, S. (2015). Editorial Overview: New Directions in the Study of Morality and Ethics. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, v-viii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.11.001 [details]
- Pittarello, A., Leib, M., Gordon-Hecker, T., & Shalvi, S. (2015). Justifications shape ethical blind spots. Psychological Science, 26(6), 794-804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571018
- Shalvi, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R., & Ayal, S. (2015). Self-serving justifications: doing wrong and feeling moral. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414553264
- Weisel, O., & Shalvi, S. (2015). The collaborative roots of corruption. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(34), 10651-10656. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423035112 [details]
2014
- Halevy, R., Shalvi, S., & Verschuere, B. (2014). Being honest about dishonesty: correlating self-reports and actual lying. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 54-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12019 [details]
- Peer, E., Acquisti, A., & Shalvi, S. (2014). "I cheated, but only a little": partial confessions to unethical behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(2), 202-217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035392
- Shalvi, S., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Oxytocin promotes group-serving dishonesty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(15), 5503-5507. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400724111 [details]
- Verschuere, B., & Shalvi, S. (2014). The truth comes naturally! Does it? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 417-423. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14535394 [details]
- Zimerman, L., Shalvi, S., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2014). Self-reported ethical risk taking tendencies predict actual dishonesty. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(1), 58-64. http://journal.sjdm.org/13/131111/jdm131111.pdf
- ten Velden, F. S., Baas, M., Shalvi, S., Kret, M. E., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Oxytocin differentially modulates compromise and competitive approach but not withdrawal to antagonists from own vs. rivaling other groups. Brain Research, 1580, 172-179. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.09.013 [details]
2013
- Shalvi, S., & Leiser, D. (2013). Moral firmness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 400-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.014
- Shalvi, S., Reijseger, G., Handgraaf, M. J. J., Appelt, K. C., ten Velden, F. S., Giacomantonio, M., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2013). Pay to walk away: prevention buyers prefer to avoid negotiation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 38, 40-49. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.03.002 [details]
2012
- De Dreu, C. K. W., Greer, L. L., Handgraaf, M. J. J., Shalvi, S., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Oxytocin modulates selection of allies in intergroup conflict. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 279(1731), 1150-1154. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1444 [details]
- Shalvi, S. (2012). Dishonestly increasing the likelihood of winning. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(3), 292-303. http://journal.sjdm.org/12/12117a/jdm12117a.html [details]
- Shalvi, S., Eldar, O., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2012). Honesty requires time (and lack of justifications). Psychological Science, 23(10), 1264-1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612443835 [details]
- Stallen, M., de Dreu, C. K. W., Shalvi, S., Smidts, A., & Sanfey, A. G. (2012). The herding hormone: Oxytocin stimulates in-group conformity. Psychological Science, 23(11), 1288-1292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612446026 [details]
- de Dreu, C. K. W., Shalvi, S., Greer, L. L., van Kleef, G. A., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2012). Oxytocin motivates non-cooperation in intergroup conflict to protect vulnerable in-group members. PLoS ONE, 7(11), Article e46751. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046751 [details]
- ten Velden, F. S., Baas, M., Shalvi, S., Preenen, P. T. Y., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2012). In competitive interaction displays of red increase actors' competitive approach and perceivers' withdrawal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1205-1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.004 [details]
2011
- Roskes, M., Sligte, D., Shalvi, S., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2011). The right side? Under time pressure, approach motivation leads to right-oriented bias. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1403-1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611418677 [details]
- Shalvi, S., Dana, J., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2011). Justified ethicality: observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.02.001 [details]
- Shalvi, S., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2011). Ethical manoeuvring: why people avoid both major and minor lies. British Journal of Management, 22(s1), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00709.x [details]
- Shalvi, S., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2011). People avoid situations that enable them to deceive others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1096-1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.015 [details]
- Shalvi, S., Shenkman, G., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2011). The danger of unrealistic optimism: linking caregivers’ perceived ability to help victims of terror with their own secondary traumatic stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(11), 2656-2672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00844.x [details]
- de Dreu, C. K. W., Greer, L. L., van Kleef, G. A., Shalvi, S., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2011). Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(4), 1262-1266. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015316108 [details]
2010
- Giacomantonio, M., de Dreu, C. K. W., Shalvi, S., Sligte, D., & Leder, S. (2010). Psychological distance boosts value-behavior correspondence in ultimatum bargaining and integrative negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 824-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.001 [details]
- Shalvi, S., Baas, M., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2010). Write when hot - Submit when not: seasonal bias in peer review or acceptance? Learned Publishing, 23(2), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1087/20100206 [details]
- Shalvi, S., Moran, S., & Ritov, I. (2010). Overcoming initial anchors: the effect of negotiators' dispositional control beliefs. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 3(3), 232-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4716.2010.00059.x [details]
- de Dreu, C. K. W., Greer, L. L., Handgraaf, M. J. J., Shalvi, S., van Kleef, G. A., Baas, M., ten Velden, F. S., van Dijk, E., & Feith, S. W. W. (2010). The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science, 328(5984), 1408-1411. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189047 [details]
2009
- de Dreu, C. K. W., Giacomantonio, M., Shalvi, S., & Sligte, D. J. (2009). Getting stuck or stepping back: effects of obstacles and construal level in the negotiation of creative solutions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 542-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.001 [details]
2006
- Shalvi, S., & Luzzatto, D. (2006). Lack of a safe environment: Emotional difficulties and coping among clinicians treating traumatized patients within a terrorized society - Israel 2006. Traumatology (Print), 12, 282-292.
2022
- Van Doesum, N. J., Murphy, R. O., Gallucci, M., Aharonov-Majar, E., Athenstaedt, U., Au, W. T., Bai, L., Böhm, R., Bovina, I., Buchan, N. R., Chen, X-P., Dumont, K. B., Engelmann, J. B., Eriksson, K., Euh, H., Fiedler, S., Friesen, J., Gächter, S., Garcia, C., ... Van Lange, P. A. M. (2022). Reply to Komatsu et al.: From local social mindfulness to global sustainability efforts? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(4), Article e2119303118. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2119303118 [details]
- Van Doesum, N. J., Murphy, R. O., Gallucci, M., Aharonov-Majar, E., Athenstaedt, U., Au, W. T., Bai, L., Böhm, R., Bovina, I., Buchan, N. R., Chen, X-P., Dumont, K. B., Engelmann, J. B., Eriksson, K., Euh, H., Fiedler, S., Friesen, J., Gächter, S., Garcia, C., ... van Lange, P. A. M. (2022). Reply to Nielsen et al.: Social mindfulness is associated with countries’ environmental performance and individual environmental concern. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(9), Article e2122077119. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122077119 [details]
2021
- Leib, M. (Author), Köbis, N. C. (Author), Soraperra, I. (Author), Weisel, O. (Author), & Shalvi, S. (Author). (2021). Code for treatment level analysis. Software, Figshare. https://doi.org/10.21942/uva.14731674.v2
2020
- Leib, M., & Shalvi, S. (2020). Justifications as a threat to honesty: a behavioral ethics approach. In C. B. Miller, & R. West (Eds.), Integrity, Honesty, and Truth Seeking (pp. 153-181). (The Virtues). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190666026.003.0006 [details]
2014
- Roskes, M., Sligte, D., Shalvi, S., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Does approach motivation induce right-oriented bias? Reply to Price and Wolfers (2014). Psychological Science, 25(11), 2112-2115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614547919 [details]
2013
- Shalvi, S., Eldar, O., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2013). Honesty requires time - a reply to Foerster et al. (2013). Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 634. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00634
2011
- Shalvi, S., Baas, M., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2011). When should we submit our papers? Reply to Hartley. Learned Publishing, 24(1), 33-34. https://doi.org/10.1087/20110106 [details]
- de Dreu, C. K. W., Greer, L. L., van Kleef, G. A., Shalvi, S., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2011). Reply to Chen et al.: Perhaps goodwill is unlimited, but oxytocin-induced goodwill is not. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(13), E46. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102269108 [details]
Prijs / subsidie
- Shalvi, S. (2023). Society of Experimental Social Psychology Fellow.
- Shalvi, S. (2019). ERC Consolidator Grant.
- Shalvi, S. (2019). Jane Beattie Award.
- Shalvi, S. (2019). VIDI NWO.
- Shalvi, S. (2018). KNAW, Sara van Dam grant.
- Shalvi, S. (2018). Amsterdam Young Academy, Elected member. https://amsterdamyoungacademy.nl/
- Shalvi, S. (2017). Best student paper award.
- Shalvi, S. (2016). Young Academy of Europe - Elected member.
- Shalvi, S. (2015). APS Rising Stars. http://www.psychologicalscience.org/rising-stars/stars.cfm
- Shalvi, S. (2014). Jos Jaspars Medal, European Association for Social Psychology early career award. http://www.easp.eu/about/awards/jos-jaspars-medals/
- Shalvi, S. (2012). American Psychological Association, Division 49 (Group Psychology and Group Psychotherapy) dissertation award 2012 (finalist; 1 of 3).
- Shalvi, S. (2012). Kurt Lewin Institute (KLI) for Social Psychology, and its applicants - The Netherlands - Runner-up, best paper award.
- Shalvi, S. (2012). Society for Business Ethics dissertation award (finalist; 1 of 3).
- Shalvi, S. (2010). International Confederation for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics and Economic Psychology (IAREP/SABE/ICABEEP).
- Shalvi, S., Handgraaf, M. J. J. & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2010). Justified ethicality: observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior..
Lidmaatschap / relevante positie
- Shalvi, S. (2016-2021). Elected member, Young Academy of Europe.
Mediaoptreden
- Shalvi, S., Leib, M. & Francke, M. (11-05-2020). Huizenkopers betalen meer bij ronde vraagprijs [Web] Parool. Huizenkopers betalen meer bij ronde vraagprijs. https://www.parool.nl/nieuws/huizenkopers-betalen-meer-bij-ronde-vraagprijs~bb6c0ce6/?referer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
- Shalvi, S., Leib, M. & Francke, M. (11-05-2020). huizenkopers betalen meer bij ronde vraagprijs [Web] AD. huizenkopers betalen meer bij ronde vraagprijs. http://ad.nl/wonen/huizenkopers-betalen-meer-bij-ronde-vraagprijs~ab6c0ce6/
- Shalvi, S., Leib, M. & Francke, M. (07-05-2020). meer geld voor je huis neem een ronde vraagprijs [Web] Telegraaf. meer geld voor je huis neem een ronde vraagprijs. https://www.telegraaf.nl/financieel/2008719892/meer-geld-voor-je-huis-neem-een-ronde-vraagprijs
- Shalvi, S. (20-06-2019). People more likely to return a wallet with money in it than an empty one [Web] ABC. People more likely to return a wallet with money in it than an empty one. https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2019-06-21/people-are-more-likely-to-return-a-wallet-if-it-has-money-in-it/11227766
- Shalvi, S. (20-06-2019). 20,000 Wallets Were Left Around the World to Test People's Honesty. The Results Will Restore Your Faith in Humanity [Web] Newsweek. 20,000 Wallets Were Left Around the World to Test People's Honesty. The Results Will Restore Your Faith in Humanity. https://www.newsweek.com/20000-wallets-left-world-test-people-honesty-results-restore-faith-humanity-1444761
- Shalvi, S. (20-06-2019). “Missing” Wallets with More Cash Are More Likely to Be Returned [Web] Scientific American. “Missing” Wallets with More Cash Are More Likely to Be Returned. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/missing-wallets-with-more-cash-are-more-likely-to-be-returned/
- Shalvi, S. (20-06-2019). Honesty is majority policy in lost wallet experiment [Web] The Guardian. Honesty is majority policy in lost wallet experiment. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/jun/20/honesty-is-majority-policy-in-lost-wallet-experiment
- Shalvi, S. (20-06-2019). Lost wallet? More cash means you're likelier to get it back [Web] AP. Lost wallet? More cash means you're likelier to get it back. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-7164295/Lost-wallet-More-cash-inside-makes-return-likelier.html
- Shalvi, S. (20-06-2019). Lost your wallet? The more cash in it the likelier you'll get it back [Web] CBS NEWS. Lost your wallet? The more cash in it the likelier you'll get it back. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/lost-your-wallet-the-more-cash-in-it-the-likelier-youll-get-it-back/
- Shalvi, S. (09-03-2016). Corrupt societies encourage lying [Web] Science. Corrupt societies encourage lying. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/03/corrupt-societies-encourage-lying
Tijdschriftredactie
- Shalvi, S. (editor) (2019-2022). Judgment and Decision Making (Journal).
- Shalvi, S. (editor) (2019-2030). Judgment and Decision Making (Journal).
- Shalvi, S. (editor) (2018). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Journal).
- Shalvi, S. (editor) (2018). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (Journal).
- Shalvi, S. (reviewer) (2016-2018). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (Journal).
- Shalvi, S. (editor) (2016-2018). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (Journal).
- Shalvi, S. (reviewer) (2016-2019). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (Journal).
- Shalvi, S. (editor) (2016-2030). Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin (Journal). https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/journal/personality-and-social-psychology-bulletin#editorial-board
- Shalvi, S. (editor) (2015-2030). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (Journal). https://www.elsevier.com/journals/organizational-behavior-and-human-decision-processes/0749-5978/editorial-board
- Shalvi, S. (reviewer) (2015-2019). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (Journal).
- Shalvi, S. (reviewer) (2014-2017). Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology (Journal).
Spreker
- Shalvi, S. (invited speaker) (15-7-2013). Keynote address: Understanding dishonesty and employee behaviors in the workplace, LESSAC - Department of Management, Organization & Entrepreneurship workshop, Dijon. http://www.escdijon.eu/recherche/conferences-internationales/workshop-understanding-employee-dishonesty-behaviors-in-the-workplace/
Andere
- Shalvi, S. (participant) & van der Weele, J. J. (participant) (18-10-2017). Moral behavior and calculated ambiguity Workshop (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
2023
- Akdeniz, A. (2023). On the origins of human sociality. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam]. [details]
2019
- Soraperra, I., Köbis, N., Efferson, C., Shalvi, S., Vogt, S., & Offerman, T. (2019). A market for integrity: An experiment on corruption in the education sector. CREED, University of Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3409962, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26059.44321 [details]
2023
- Vu, M. L., Soraperra, I., Leib, M., van der Weele, J. & Shalvi, S. (20-9-2023). Aggregated dataset and readme file. Universiteit van Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.21942/uva.19506658.v1
2022
- Akdeniz, A., Jagau, S., Shalvi, S. & van Veelen, M. (17-8-2022). Data for "Evolution of honesty by partner choice". Universiteit van Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.21942/uva.20502924.v1
- Steinel, W., Valtcheva, K., Gross, J., Celse, J., Max, S., Shalvi, S., Steinel, W., Valtcheva, K. & Sciences, D. (2022). (Dis)honesty in the face of uncertain gains or losses. DataverseNL. https://doi.org/10.34894/rffaka
2021
- Leib, M., Shalvi, S., Soraperra, I., Köbis, N. & Weisel, O. (12-10-2021). Treatment level dataset and read me file. Universiteit van Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.21942/uva.14731593.v3
This list of publications is extracted from the UvA-Current Research Information System. Questions? Ask the library or the Pure staff of your faculty / institute. Log in to Pure to edit your publications. Log in to Personal Page Publication Selection tool to manage the visibility of your publications on this list. -
Nevenwerkzaamheden
-
European Association for Decision Making
Board member
-
European Association for Decision Making
Dorrough, A., Köbis, N. C., Irlenbusch, B., Shalvi, S., & Glockner, A. (2023). Conditional bribery: Insights from incentivized experiments across 18 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.