New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Graduation review for Fluentd #69
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Silva <eduardo@treasure-data.com>
I'm in the middle of updating affiliations list process, *.cncftest.io contains new affiliations data while *.devstats.cncf.io still has old. |
New affiliations will be on prod today, ETA about 1-3 hours from now. |
K8s, Prometheus, OpenTracing, Fluentd is finished on prod, remaining (linkerd, gRPC, CoreDNS, containerd) are WIP ATM, but will be ready soon. |
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Silva <eduardo@treasure-data.com>
UPDATE Fluentd graduation request has been updated:
|
Could you please provide a brief update on the incubation criteria, and provide some color in cases where metrics are stable or have declined relative to 18 months ago. I'm thinking specifically of the following:
... where superficially it looks like metrics may have declined. Clearly this might correlate with transitioning towards maintenance mode, but there may be other explanations worth clarifying. |
reviews/graduation-fluentd.md
Outdated
|
||
### Understanding Fluentd and it Ecosystem | ||
|
||
Fluentd have a different ecosystem model that other projects, it's composed by a small and stable code base and most of the functionalities are available through plugins which can be: inputs, filters, parsers, buffers and outputs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: than other projects
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed, thanks.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Silva <eduardo@treasure-data.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Silva <eduardo@treasure-data.com>
@quinton-hoole thanks for the feedback. I've added a new section called Progress since joining CNCF as an incubation project on December 2016 with some insights. About contributors to Fluentd and it ecosystem please refer to the following dashboard that documents the contribution in the last quarter: |
Hi ToC & CNCF (cc: @caniszczyk @dankohn) thanks for your time reviewing and providing feedback on this proposal. All your public/private suggestions have been considered and are reflected in the latest changes on this pull request. Fluentd team would like to ask for an official voting process in the next ToC meeting (August 21th). We appreciate your consideration. |
@edsiper I put it on the docket for the @cncf/toc to review at tomorrow's meeting on whether to vote or request more information. Thanks for updating the proposal. |
@edsiper Thanks, but the dashboard you linked to shows a 50% decline in contributing companies between March 2017 and June 2018. Similarly a drop in developer of around 25% between Mar 2018 and June 2018. I would like you to explain why that is so. |
@quinton-hoole thanks for pointing that. Honestly we don't have a reason for the why, note that is visible only on Fluentd core, it's hard to know. But what we see is the continue creation and update of extensions/plugins made by the community (other companies and individuals) plus adoption. |
Thanks @edsiper , that makes sense. Please add a short note to that effect in the PR for completeness. |
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Silva <eduardo@treasure-data.com>
b11ba23
to
faad0ec
Compare
@quinton-hoole done, note added at bottom of Understanding Fluentd and it Ecosystem section. thanks again. |
Perfect, thanks. |
Just giving the @cncf/toc and folks an update on this, the trademark/legal dance took longer than expected on this but we will be moving forward soon with a vote on this. |
Does fluentd have any official statements regarding security? I've found a few third-party blogs like the one below, but have not been able to find any statements around security in the official fluentd documentation? https://banzaicloud.com/blog/k8s-logging-tls/ See also #145 I tried checking the CII report for Fluentd, but unfortunately their web site is currently down: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/1189 Any help in understanding fluentd's stance wrt secure logging would be appreciated. |
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Silva <eduardo@treasure-data.com>
From a security context and due to the nature of the tool, Fluentd cares about security when delivering the logs over the network offering optional TLS, but note this is optional and users decide when to enable it if the output plugin support that mode (e.g: Elasticsearch users sometimes uses HTTP and others HTTPs) We are currently scheduling a security audit for Fluentd and this is being handled by CNCF, our initial meeting should be shortly. |
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Silva <eduardo@treasure-data.com>
Project Health Dashboard: https://all.devstats.cncf.io/d/54/project-health?orgId=1&var-repogroup_name=Fluentd |
Slides from December TOC meeting: |
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Silva <eduardo@treasure-data.com>
update Fluentd Graduation document has been updated with current statistics |
+1 binding TOC votes (8/9): |
congrats on graduating :) |
No description provided.