Medicaid block grant program could cap spending, limit benefits in Ohio, experts say

Donald Trump and Seema Verma of CMS

In this file photo, Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Seema Verma listen at right as President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington. The Trump administration has a Medicaid deal for states: more control over health care spending on certain low-income residents if they agree to a limit on how much the feds kick in. It's unclear how many states would be interested in such a trade-off under a complex Medicaid block grant proposal unveiled by Seema Verma, head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)AP

CLEVELAND, Ohio — Ohio public policy experts are divided on the Trump administration’s new Medicaid block grant program, which is designed to give states more flexibility in Medicaid spending, but cap a portion of federal contributions.

Opponents of the plan, which was introduced Jan. 30, say it will cut benefits and enrollment.

Supporters say it will help control costs and give states more flexibility over Medicaid dollars.

Loren Anthes, public policy fellow for Community Solutions, a Cleveland-based think tank, said block grants are “just code for making cuts.”

“I think that the policy consequences associated with this proposal are dramatic and err on the side of less coverage, less benefits and greater chance for economic disruption for individuals and for whole communities,” Anthes said.

Rea Hederman Jr., executive director of the Economic Research Center and vice president of policy at The Buckeye Institute, on the other hand, called the block grant waiver “a new tool” to manage the Medicaid program and said it is worth exploring.

The program, called Healthy Adult Opportunity, allows states to apply for a waiver to receive a fixed block grant for Medicaid costs, using either an aggregate cap or a per-capita cap for federal Medicaid contributions. Currently, states receive matching funds, known as Federal Medical Assistance Percentages, from the federal government for Medicaid costs.

To participate in the HAO program, states need to apply for what is known as a Section 1115 demonstration waiver. These waivers allow states to test new ways to deliver or pay for Medicaid services. For example, Ohio in 2019 was approved for a waiver allowing the state to impose work requirements on the Medicaid expansion population – able-bodied adults without dependents.

“I think the state should absolutely have a conversation with the federal government to unpack some of the ideas and the guidance,” Hederman Jr. said. “Any time you have a new tool like this, it makes sense to understand whether this tool helps you in your work.”

Ohio Medicaid Director Maureen Corcoran told The Columbus Dispatch on Feb. 12 that she doesn’t plan to apply for block grant funding at this point.

In Ohio, about 3 million people are on Medicaid, about 600,000 of which were covered through the state’s 2014 Medicaid expansion. The plan only applies to the Medicaid expansion population and doesn’t include children, pregnant women, elderly adults and people with disabilities.

Under HAO, states would be able to make changes to Medicaid, such as limiting benefits for enrollees, imposing higher co-pays on drugs and doctor visits and controlling which drugs are covered.

Anthes characterized those options as “the sorts of things that make the benefit harder to access and less meaningful.”

“I believe it’s been a very intentional policy position of lawmakers who do not like Medicaid as an entitlement that the way to disrupt or end the entitlement is through these sorts of mechanisms,” Anthes said.

Hederman Jr. said disenrollment is not a part of the plan and that the proposal is “aimed at delivering Medicaid services more efficiently.”

“This is not your traditional Republican block grant idea of 20 years ago. It’s a lot more limited in scope with a lot of safeguards put in place. It’s very clear that you still have to offer the required amount of benefits,” Hederman Jr. said.

Because the plan was rolled out by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and not through the legislative process, Anthes and Hederman Jr. both expect any proposed state waivers to be challenged legally, as was the case with Medicaid work requirement waivers. On Feb. 14, a federal appeals court struck down the Trump administration’s decision to permit Medicaid work requirements in Arkansas.

More health stories:

Death of Lake County 11-year-old is the second flu-related pediatric death in Ohio

New SNAP requirements, red tape could leave more Ohioans without food

Novel coronavirus less deadly than past epidemics, local experts say

‘I basically have to stay sick:’ NE Ohioans feel the costs of delaying health care

Medicare reimbursement change altering how skilled nursing facilities provide therapy

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.