Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Darwin academic accused of ‘poor and lazy research’

19th century Perthshire farmer Patrick Matthew
19th century Perthshire farmer Patrick Matthew

An Edinburgh University scientist, who has spent years forensically researching the work of Charles Darwin, has rubbished claims that the Origin of Species author plagiarised a Perthshire farmer.

Julian Derry, who has published on Darwin under the name J.F. Derry, said the claims by Nottingham Trent University lecturer and leading criminologist Dr Mike Sutton were down to “very poor and lazy research offset by a big aggressive ego”.

In a lively lecture organised by the Carse of Gowrie Sustainability Group at the James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, on Thursday night, Dr Sutton claimed that Darwin may have ‘borrowed’ the theory of natural selection from the relatively unknown Carse of Gowrie fruit farmer Patrick Matthew.

As revealed by The Courier, he challenged the orthodox view that Darwin was the first to discover the process of natural selection and that the Origin of Species, published in 1859, had been heavily influenced by Matthew’s book ‘On Naval Timber and Arboriculture’, published in 1831, which contains the complete hypothesis of the theory of natural selection.

He also claimed that Darwin, who always denied plagiarism, and his co-publisher Alfred Russel Wallace, must not only have been aware of Matthew’s work but borrowed from it heavily.

Sutton claimed Scotland had been denied a “science hero” and that a “great injustice” had been done.

But in an open letter sent to members of the Carse of Gowrie Sustainability Group yesterday, Mr Derry, who did not attend Thursday’s lecture, said that while Matthew was “clearly a great man of vision”, he did not influence the course of evolutionary history in the way that is claimed.

He said: “Darwin and Wallace did not plagiarise Matthew, and were not tipped off to his discovery of natural selection by their circle of friends and colleagues. Or rather, if any of this did occur, it has not been shown to have done so by the data presented by Dr Sutton.

“Why I say this, like this, carefully and cautiously, is because as a scientist, I must be confident beyond any reasonable doubt that the data and its interpretation do prove that these events happened as claimed. This is quite a different philosophy to the one underlying Dr Sutton’s research.

“I have never heard a scientist in any discipline use the kind of language that he does to criticise others and qualify his findings, for example, “100% certainty”. Every scientist I know worth their salt doesn’t even have the phrase in their vocabulary.”

Dr Sutton could not be contacted yesterday.

Fiona Ross, chairperson of Carse of Gowrie Sustainability Group said: “I will leave the ‘scientific battle of words’ with regards to Dr Sutton’s comprehensive “newly found data” to my eminent peers. However, what is a reality in our community is that most local people have just never heard of Matthew!

“A prolific farmer, botanist, anthropologist and campaigner for sustainable communities in the 19th Century. A man who created a 10,000 tree orchard, the largest on record here, in an area with a 800 year orchard heritage!

“Preston Watson, a man, who it is argued flew the first flight before the Wright Brothers, at Errol Airfield, at least has a road named after him.

“Matthew, a man who discovered ‘natural selection’ in plants 30 years before Darwin, had his grave in Errol graveyard covered over a few years later by the burial of local businessman.

“Our question is why has his legacy gone without respectful recognition? And how can we address that! The aim of this week’s collaboration with Dr Sutton, Matthew’s descendants and the Hutton Institute, was to promote Matthew’s legacy locally and nationally. At last night’s lecture, we asked the 60 attendees if they would support this work and the answer was a resounding Yes!’”